A systematic review of green infrastructure effects on urban ecosystems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Global urbanization continues unabated, with more than 50% of the worlds’ population living in cities. Cities are conventionally viewed as a threat to local biodiversity because natural habitat is replaced with development. However, more recently, there is greater acknowledgement from the public and private sectors that supporting local environments sustains critical ecosystem services, which in turn improves human health and biodiversity conservation. Consequently, urban planning and design has shifted towards green infrastructure (GI), such as green roofs and retention ponds, to increase connections between city and nature in an era of climate change. The contribution of GI to some ecosystem services has been proven (e.g. stormwater management, building cooling), but the contribution to biodiversity conservation remains unspecified. Using a systematic literature review, this dataset is an aggregation of studies that have measured community composition of urban ecosystems in association with green infrastructures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it