Phenotype pictures of wheat heads infected with Fusarium graminearum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fusarium head blight (FHB) of wheat (Triticum aestivum), caused by the fungal pathogen Fusarium graminearum (Fg), reduces grain yield and quality due to the production of the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol. Manual rating for incidence (percent of infected wheat heads/spikes) and severity (percent of spikelets infected) to estimate FHB resistance, is time-consuming and subject to human error. This study uses a deep learning model, combined with a spectral index, to provide rapid phenotyping of FHB severity. An object detection model was used to localize wheat heads within boundary boxes. Corresponding boxes were used to prompt Meta’s Segment Anything Model to segment wheat heads. Using 2576 images of wheat heads point inoculated with Fg in a controlled environment, a spectral index was developed using the red and green bands to differentiate healthy from infected tissue and estimate disease severity. Stratified random sampling was applied to pixels within the segmentation mask, and the model classified pixels as healthy or infected with an accuracy of 87.8%. Linear regression determined the relationship between the index and visual severity scores. The severity estimated by the index was able to predict visual scores (R2=0.83, p=<2e-16). This workflow was also applied to plot size images of infected wheat heads from an outside dataset with varying cultivars and light conditions, to assess model transferability. It correctly classified pixels as healthy or infected with a prediction accuracy of 85.8%. These methods may provide rapid estimation of FHB severity to improve selection efficiency for resistance or estimate disease pressure for effective management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".