MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6892268011 · doi:10.5066/p93do0eo

Airborne electromagnetic, magnetic, and radiometric survey of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain, Mississippi Embayment, and Gulf Coastal Plain, September 2021 - January 2022

2023· dataset· en· W6892268011 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUSGS DOI Tool Production Environment · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiometric datingAlluviumHydrology (agriculture)Alluvial plainRiver deltaLoessWater tableAerial survey

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Airborne electromagnetic (AEM), magnetic, and radiometric data were acquired September 2021 to January 2022 along 27,204 line-kilometers (line-km) over the Mississippi Alluvial Plain (MAP), Mississippi Embayment, and Gulf Coastal Plain. Data were acquired by Xcalibur Multiphysics (Canada), Ltd. with three different airborne sensors: the 30Hz TEMPEST time-domain AEM instrument that is used to map subsurface geologic structure at depths up to 300 meters (m) depending on the subsurface resistivity; a Scintrex CS-3 cesium vapor magnetometer that detects changes in deep (hundreds of meters to kilometers) geologic structure based on variations in the magnetic properties of different formations; and a Radiation Solutions RS-500 spectrometer that detects the abundance of natural radioelements potassium, uranium, and thorium in the upper 20-30 centimeters that is used to determine differences in soil constituents. The survey was flown at a nominal sensor flight height of 120 m above terrain with 300 and 600 km (nominal) spaced east-west flight lines. The main survey block covers 24,654 line-km. The Chicot aquifer focus area was surveyed along 360 line-km (flight numbers 2900101-2900421 nonsuccessive). The Mississippi River and the Atchafalaya River were surveyed along their center axes, covering 742 line-km (flight line numbers 6004001-6004003 and 5002001-5002002). Two separate inset grids were flown: (1) University of Memphis (UMemphis) focus area lines with 500 m line spacing for a total of 1260 line-km (flight line numbers 1000301-1030001 nonsuccessive), and (2) Hot Springs focus area with 350 m line spacing for a total of 188 line-km (flight line numbers 2001001-2027001 nonsuccessive). 91-series lines are repeat test-lines flown periodically throughout the survey, with one repeat line established for each base station. 901- and 904-series lines are flown under standard survey conditions with the transmitter on and the receiver off to evaluate the noise contribution from the acquisition system pre- and post- flight, respectively. 902- and 905-series lines are ~60 second high-altitude datasets collected to evaluate the system out of ground-response pre- and post- flight, respectively. 903-series lines are 30-40 second 'swoop' datasets to confirm correct operation of the system during variable pitch manoeuvres. 906-series lines are flown under standard survey conditions with the transmitter off and the receiver on to evaluate the ambient noise in the system. AEM data were inverted using 1-D inversion to produce models of electrical resistivity along flight paths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUSGS DOI Tool Production EnvironmentFrench-language works237,207