MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6892276738 · doi:10.5063/f11r6p0w

Meteorological and thermal structure data at Lake Janauacá from November 2014 to September 2016

2022· dataset· en· W6892276738 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueUC Santa Barbara · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuoyancyShortwave radiationWind speedAir temperatureTemperature measurementRelative humidityThermalStratification (seeds)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset contains meteorological data, measured and simulated temperature and buoyancy frequency data reported in the paper titled 'Hydrodynamic modeling of stratification and mixing in shallow, tropical floodplain lakes' by Zhou et al.. The meteorological data include time (Time) shortwave radiation (SWin), air temperature (Tair), relative humidity (RH), wind speed (WS), wind direction (WD) and rainfall (Rain) prepared for AEM3D and DYRESM simulations during the periods of field campaigns from November 2014 to September 2016 (Met_campaigns) and data for AEM3D simulations with simulation length extended (Met_extended.nc). Correspondingly, temperature and buoyancy frequency data have been organized into two files, one for the campaign periods (T_N_campaigns.nc) and the other for the extended periods (T_N_extended.nc). Each temperature and buoyancy frequency data file contains time (Time), depth (depth), temperature (T) and buoyancy frequency (N), with measured data marked with 'measured' and simulated data marked with 'aem3d' or 'dyresm'. These data have been directly used to create Fig. 3, 4, 7, 11 in the paper and Fig. S1, S2, S5, S7, S9, S11 and S14 to S17 in the supporting information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUC Santa BarbaraSame topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207