Bibliographic record
Abstract
Subgenus LEUCOPIS Meigen ninae Tanasijtshuk Leucopis ninae Tanasijtshuk, 1966: 234. Type locality: Kazakhstan, Aksay, in vicinity of Alma-Ata [Almaty]. Holotype male, ZIN (examined). References — Tanasijtshuk, 1984: 228 (catalog), 1986: 272 (redescription, Figures 522–524 [male genitalia]), 2003: 176 (biology); Stary et al., 1993: 360 (biological control, released in 1992 in Chile against Diuraphis noxia); Ripa et al., 1995: 428 (biological control, released in 1992–1993 on Easter Island against black citrus aphid, Toxoptera aurantia); Gaimari & Turner, 1996a: 649 (description, immature stages), 650 (Figures 1, 7 [egg]), 652 (Figures 10, 15 [larvae], 16 [puparium]), 654 (Figures 18, 21 [larvae], 655 (Figures 24 (larva), 27 [puparium], 656 (Figures 29, 32, 35 [larvae], 658 (Figures 38, 41, 42, 45 [cephalopharyngeal skeleton], 659 (Figures 50–51 [cephalic structures, larvae], 52 [cephalopharyngeal skeleton, puparium], 661 (Figures 54, 55, 57 [larval spiracles], 59 [puparial spiracles]), 661 (Figures 62, 64, 66 [larvae]), 1996b: 667 (biology), 1996c: 365 (biology, rearing), 1997: 155 (biology); Vargas, 1998: 16 (biological control, released in 1903–1997 in Chile against aphids); Gaimari & Havill, 2021: 28 (in key), 31 (biology, catalog). Distribution — Chile (introduced). Región de Coquimbo: Elqui Province (Vicuña). Región de Valparaíso: Quillota Province (La Cruz); Los Andes Province (Los Andes); San Felipe de Aconcagua Province (Putaendo); Isla de Pascua Province (Easter Island—introduced but not recovered). Región de Ñuble: Diguillín Province (Chillán). [also: southern Europe (widespread); North Africa; central Asia (widespread); China; Canada (introduced); USA (introduced); South Africa (introduced)]. Host Records —In Chile, released as a biological control agent against Diuraphis noxia infesting cereals and Toxoptera aurantia on Citrus, in addition to Aphis fabae, Brevicoryne brassicae, Myzus dirhodum, Myzus persicae, Rhopalosiphum maidis, Rhopalosiphum padi and Schizaphis graminum. Polyphagous species, attacking many aphidoid and coccoid Hemiptera throughout its distribution. Leucopis begimbetovae Tanasijtshuk, 1966: 235. Type locality: Kazakhstan, Alma-Athkar. Holotype male, ZIN (examined). References — Tanasijtshuk, 1984: 228 (catalog, synonymy), 1986: 272 (as synonym).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".