Scipopus (Scipopus) souzalopesi Albuquerque 1972
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scipopus (Scipopus) souzalopesi Albuquerque, 1972 Figs 31–32 Scipopus souzalopesi Albuquerque, 1972b: 93, figs 1–11. Scipopus souzalopesi – Ratcliffe & Penny 1978: 695 (catalog). — Ferro & de Carvalho 2014: 60 (listed). Differential diagnosis Scipopus (Scipopus) souzalopesi closely resembles S. (S.) erythrocephalus in having a dull, orange epicephalon, shiny, bare anterior patches on the orbital plate and a dark first fore tarsomere. Scipopus (S.) souzalopesi differs in the distinct pattern of pale microtrichose spots on the scutum, the long (3.0– 4.0× as long as T6) oviscape, and the small (~2.3 × length of T6) genital fork. Type material Holotype (not examined) BRAZIL • 1 ♂; Acre, Estrada do Xapuri, Rio Branco; 30 Jan. 1971; A. Faustino leg.; INPA. Paratypes (not examined) BRAZIL • 1 ♀; Estrada Manaus-Itacoatiara km 26 Reserva Florestal Ducke; 14 Aug. 1969; L.P. Albuquerque and A. Faustino leg.; INPA • 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding; INPA • 1 ♀; Estrada Manaus Rio Branco km 38; 5 Aug. 1961; E.V. Silva leg.; INPA • 1 ♀; Pará, Capanema; n° 1216 a 1222; H.S. Lopes leg.; INPA. Other material examined BRAZIL • 1 ♀; Amazonas, AM:010 km 31, Embrapa; 9 Jan. 1991; L.P. Albuquerque and J.E. Binda leg.; INPA • 1 ♀; Amazonas, Manaus; 13–20 May 1989; Y. Camara and J.F. Vidal leg.; “ Isca de Fruta ” [fruit bait]; INPA • 1 ♀; Rondania, Vilhena; 27 Jul. 1983; N. Penny leg.; INPA • 1 ♂; Pará, Benevides; Oct. 1918; S.M. Klages leg.; “ C.M. Acc. 6174”; CMNH. COLOMBIA • 1 ♀; Amazonas, PNN Amacayacu, Matamata; 3°41′ S, 70°15′ W; 150 m a.s.l; 11–25 Sep. 2000; A Parente leg.; Malaise; M.846; IAVH • 3 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding; 27 Mar–3 Apr. 2000; IAVH • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; 3–9 Apr. 2000; IAVH • 2 ♀♀; Amazonas, PNN Amacayacu, Matamata m2; 3°23′ S, 70°6′ W; 150 m a.s.l; 25 Jun.–9 Jul. 2001; D. Chota leg.; Malaise; M.2031; IAVH • 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding; 9–30 Jul. 2001; M.2030; IAVH • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; 2–15 Oct. 2001; M.2239; IAVH • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; 25 Aug.–3 Sep. 2001; M.2240; IAVH (dissected and photographed, Fig. 31F) • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; M.2244; IAVH • 4 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding; San Martin; 15 Oct.–5 Nov. 2001; M.2767; IAVH (photographed, Fig. 31A, C, E) • 3 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding; 26 Feb.–12 Mar. 2001; M.1611; IAVH • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; 3°46′ S, 70°18′ W; 2–16 Apr. 2001; M.1613; IAVH • 1 ♀; Putumayo, PNN La Paya Cabaña Viviano; 0°02′ S, 75°12′ W; 330 m a.s.l.; 5–25 Dec. 2001; E Lozano leg.; Malaise; M.2797 • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; debu01088986/MYCRO526-19 sequenced for CO1–5′; IAVH. ECUADOR • 1 ♀; Napo, Tiputini Biodiversity Stn; 0°36′50″ S, 76°9′1″ W; May 2011; S.A. Marshall leg.; DEBU (photographed, Fig. 32) • 3 ♀♀; Prov. Orellano, Yasuni Natl. Pk., Yasuni Research Stn; 0°40′50″ S, 76°24′2″ W; 250 m a.s.l.; 28 Apr.–8 May 2009; M.D. Jackson leg.; QCAZ • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; “ S. Pances ” leg.; on log; debu01088985/MYCRO525-19 sequenced for CO1–5′, CO1–3′, 12S, 28S; DEBU • 1 ♀; same locality as for preceding; 0°38′ S, 76°36′ W; 3–20 Sep. 1998; T. Pape and B. Viklund leg.; DEBU. PERU • 1 ♀; Cusco, Estación Biológica Villa Carmen; 12°54′ S, 71°24′ W; 500–700 m a.s.l.; 29 Jun. 2014; trap VC-ML-40A; USNM • 1 ♀; Iquitos, Mar.–Apr. 1931; R.C. Shannon leg.; USNM. Description LENGTH. 9–15 mm. HEAD. Palpus orange, pale brown microtrichose, black setulose, narrow (length 4.3 × height). Clypeus orange or light brown, width ~2.0× height, bare medially, white microtrichose in posterolateral corners. Frontal vitta dull, orange, microtrichose, orbital plate anteriorly bare, shiny, orange or light brown. Epicephalon dull, orange, microtrichose, not clearly delineated from upper frontal vitta. Paracephalon orange or light brown, slightly convex on posterolateral portions. All head chaetotaxy well-developed (missing in specimen from Fig. 31). THORAX. Scutum black-brown, dark brown microtrichose with indistinct pale brown median vitta flanked by blue sheen; distinct pale brown microtrichosity above anterior postpronotal lobe, indistinct pale spots anterior and posterior to transverse suture, pair of small pale brown spots on most median points of transverse suture (Fig. 31C). Female cervical sclerite relatively flat. Postpronotal lobe dark brown, several short setulae on outer margin. Notopleuron dark brown with pale microtrichose spots. Thorax dark brown or black with the following microtrichosity: entirely white on proepisternum and proepimeron, white on anteroventral ½ and posteromedian margin of anepisternum (Fig. 31E), otherwise brown, mostly white on katepisternum, with brown spots ventrally, posterodosally and medially, white with brown median spot on katatergite. Legs black-brown with blue sheen. First fore and hind tarsomere brown with ventral golden fringe. Wing uniformly brown infuscate. FEMALE ABDOMEN. T1 with fine, long, white setae. T1+2 ~2.0 × length of T3. Pleuron grey microtrichose, P1, dorsal half of P2–3 and P6, entirety of P4–5 dark brown. Oviscape black, sparsely setulose, pale brown microtrichose on ventral ⅓, ~3.0–4.0× length of T6. Combined spermathecal ducts short and narrow; common duct just under ½ of entire duct length. Paired spermathecal duct narrow, short (≈ to spermathecal length, although spermathecae are longer in this species), parallel-sided, apex very swollen. Paired spermathecal stems very short, almost absent. Paired spermathecae narrow, elongate, curved apically with numerous reflexed tubercles. Single spermathecal duct arising from basal ⅛ of paired duct, narrow, ½ diameter and ⅔ length of paired duct, swollen apically. Single spermatheca finger-like and elongate, with sparse tubercles. MALE ABDOMEN (from Albuquerque 1972b). T1+2 approximately twice the length of T3. Genital fork ~2.3× length of T6, arms converging, inner basal process straight, ¹/5 the length of arm. Epandrium elongate (length>2.0× height), rounded posteriorly, sparsely short setose on posteroventral margin. Basiphallus small, crescent-shaped. Basal distiphallus short (~3.0× phallic bulb length), broad, ending in short (length ≈ height), small phallic bulb with upper and lower chamber. Distal distiphallus long, expanded apically, ~2.0 × length of epandrium. Phallapodeme slender, not apically expanded. Distribution Brazil, Colombia (new record), Ecuador (new record), Peru (new record).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".