MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6892456333 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10667957

Acalypha decaryana Leandri

2023· article· en· W6892456333 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThreatened speciesEndangered speciesRiparian zoneHabitat destructionEndemismHabitatDeciduousRange (aeronautics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

13. Acalypha decaryana Leandri Notulae Systematicae. Herbier du Muséum de Paris. Phanérogramie. Paris 10: 284 (Leandri 1942). — Type: Madagascar. Prov. Toliara, Ambovombe, 20.VIII.1924, R. Decary 2985 (lecto-, designated here: P [P00508553]; isolecto-, W [W1962-0013399]). ICONOGRAPHY. — Leandri (1942: 285); Figs 28F; 35A. ETYMOLOGY. — The epithet honors French botanist Raymond Decary (1891-1973). DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT. — Endemic to Madagascar (Menabe, Atsimo-Andrefana, Ihorombe, Androy, Anosy, and Atsimo-Atsinanana). Dry deciduous forest and spiny thickets; sometimes in riparian forest. On Mesozoic limestone, basalt, basement rocks, sandstone, and unconsolidated sand. Altitudinal range (10-) 30-900 (-1000) m (Fig. 27). PRELIMINARY CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT. — The EOO of Acalypha decaryana is estimated to be 130 409 km 2 and its AOO 172 km 2, which is less than the 500 km 2 threshold of the B2 subcriterion of the Endangered category. This species grows mainly in dry deciduous forest (see assessment of A. diminuta) and spiny thickets, one of the most threatened ecosystems in Madagascar (Aronson et al. 2018). Acalypha decaryana has been collected in some protected areas, but it is also known from several unprotected forests subject to various threats (uncontrolled fires for grazing and crops, logging, mining, etc.). Ongoing habitat loss will cause continued decline of its EOO and AOO. Acalypha decaryana is assessed as Near Threatened (NT) under criterion B. It meets the AOO values needed for a threatened category, but the number of locations is too high to meet the conditions required for a listing under the Endangered category. MATERIAL EXAMINED. — 78 collections. Madagascar. Allorge, L. 2185 (P[P00122670]); Birkinshaw, C.R. 424 (P[P04779214]); Boiteau, P. 2539 (P[P00508569]); Bosser, M.J. 4022 (P[P04779809]), 4073 (P[P04779789]), 10208 (P[P04779811]), 13994 (P[P04779791]), 17213 (P[P00324548]), 17275 (MO [MO-3025010], P[P00324551], TAN), 17417 (P[P00324550, P05543683]), 17840 (P[P00324555, P05543685]); De Block, P. 2383 (BR [BR0000005518647], K, P[P04786280], TAN); Decary, R. 2964 (P[P00508568]), 2985 (P[P00508553], W[W1962-0013399]), 3115 (P[P00508567]), 3247 (L[L0241288], P[P00508566]), 3433 (P[P00508565]), 3728 (P[P00508564, P04786273], S[S13-13801]), 3789 (G, P[P00508563]), 4264 (G, P[P00508562]), 4278 (P[P00508561]), 4343 (P[P00508560]), 8433 (P[P00508559]), 8526 (P[P00508558]), 8878 (P[P00508557], US[US01287334]), 8910 (P[P00508556]), 8956 (P[P00508555]), 8985 (P[P00508554]), 9030 (P[P00508552]), 9079 (B[B100273581], P[P00508551]), 9206 (P[P04779838]), 9864 (P[P00508550]), 10452 bis (P[P04779825]), s.n. (L[L0241289]); Dequaire, J. 24109 (P[P05547013]); Descoings, B. 3108 (P[P05547016]), 3625 (P[P05547012]), 3626 (P[P05547014]); Eboroke,S.959 (P[P05547078]); Groeninckx, I. 317 (BR [BR0000005513222]); Homolle, A.M. 1706 (P[P05547015]); Humbert, H. 2997 (G, K, MO, P[P00508547, P00508548]), 2997 bis (P[P00508546], WAG[WAG.1930096]), 5405 (B[B100351094], BR[BR0000005045341], GH[GH01097245], MA[MA-01-00820754],NY[NY3091182], P[P00508544, P00508545], S, US[US01287332]), 5640 (GH [GH01097253], P[P00508542, P00508543], US[US01287333]), 11412 (P[P05547248]), 12423 (L[L3795925], MEXU[MEXU1364277], P[P00508537, P00508538, P00508539, P00508540, P00508541]), 12835 (P[P00508536]), 12902 (P[P00508535]), 13098 (B[B100174358], G, P[P00508532, P00508533, P00508534], WAG[WAG1930098]), 13809 (P[P00508530, P00508531]), 14166 (P[P00508529]), 29130 (P[P05547080]), 29182 (P[P05547251]), 29434 (G, P[P05547252], NY[NY2710390]), 29449 (P[P05547253]), 29450 (G, P[P05547254], WAG[WAG.1930092]); Leandri, J.3564 (P[P05547079]), 3566 (G, P[P05547247], WAG[WAG.1930091]); Lowry II,P.P.6930 (MA, MO), 6991 (MA, MO,P[P05481880]); McPherson,G.14916 (P[P00508528]); Messmer, N. NM 184 (G[G00420832], WAG[WAG.1930097]); O’Connor, S. 38 (K), 53 (K); Peltier, J. 2820 (P[P05547017]); Perrier de la Bâthie, H. 9763 (P[P00508527]), 9780 (P[P00508526]); Phillipson, P.B. 1751 (MO, P[P00508525], WAG[WAG.0133186]); Rakotomalaza, P. 211 (MO [MO-2965752], P[P05547994]), 217 (MAUAM, MO, P[P00460980],TAN), 305 (P[P04779767]); Rakotonasolo,F.6580-RN (P[P05547077]); Randriatsivery, M.F.351 (MO); Ravelonarivo, D. 4648 (MO [MO-3086130]); Richard, M. 0128 (K); Schlieben, H.J. 8214 (BR [BR0000014625152], G); Service Forestier Madagascar 8486-SF (P[P00508524]). REFERENCES. — Govaerts et al. (2000: 59); Seebaluck et al. (2015: 150); Montero Muñoz et al. (2018a: 95). DESCRIPTION Shrubs, deciduous, to 3 m tall, monoecious. Branches reddish, appressed-pubescent and with rounded resinous glands, glabrescent when mature; brachyblasts present. Axillary buds ovoid, to 1 × 0.7mm, perulate,perules 2,imbricate, chartaceous,blackish, sparsely hairy. Stipules to 1.5 mm long, triangular-lanceolate, midrib appressed-pubescent with simple trichomes,margin ciliate. Petioles 2-5 cm long, pubescent with simple, short trichomes. Leaf blades 1.5-2.5(-4)[-7.5] × 0.4-0.6(-2)[-3.5] cm, elliptic to oblong, sometimes obovate, membranous; base obtuse to acute; apex rounded to obtuse, sometimes acute; margin serrate, teeth subacute; upper and lower surfaces pubescent with simple, short trichomes; lower surface also with rounded resinous glands; venation pinnate, secondary veins 6-7 per side. Stipels absent. Inflorescences spiciform,unisexual, axillary. Male inflorescences densely flowered, to 1.5 cm long; subsessile, peduncle to 1 mm long, densely pubescent; flowers glomerate; bracts to 0.5 mm long, ovate-lanceolate, ciliate with simple, short, trichomes. Female inflorescences laxly flowered, to 3 cm long; peduncle filiform, 6-10 mm long, it and rachis pubescent with simple, short trichomes; bracts 1-3, sessile, enlarging in fruit to 4 × 5.5 mm, orbicular-reniform, with two reddish papillae at base, pubescent with simple, short trichomes and rounded resinous glands; margin dentate to crenate-dentate,teeth c. 20, rounded to subtriangular,central tooth not prominent; bracteoles to 0.3 mm long, triangular, sparsely hairy. Male flowers: pedicel to 1 mm long, sparsely hairy; buds to 0.5 mm diameter, sparsely hairy and with some rounded resinous glands. Female flowers 1 per bract, sessile; sepals 3-4, to 1 mm long, triangular, appressed-pubescent with simple, short trichomes; ovary c. 1 mm diameter, 3-lobed, smooth,surface pubescent with simple,short,appressed trichomes and rounded resinous glands; styles 3, to 4 mm long, distinct, sparsely hairy on rachis,with simple trichomes, each divided into 8-10 slender segments. Allomorphic flowers sometimes present at female inflorescence apex; pedicel filiform, to 2 mm long, pubescent with simple, curved, antrorse trichomes; sepals 3, to 0.5 mm long, triangular, pubescent with simple,short trichomes and rounded resinous glands; ovary 1-lobed, to 1 mm diameter, densely pubescent with simple trichomes; style 1, to 4 mm long, glabrous. Capsules to 3 mm diameter, smooth, surface pubescent with simple, short, appressed trichomes and rounded resinous glands. Seeds c. 1.8 × 1.2 mm, pyriform, foveolate. NOTE Leandri designated Decary 2985 as the type, but he did not indicate the herbarium.We located two specimens of this collection. The one at P, where Leandri worked, is the only one that bears the word “type” written by Leandri. We therefore designate this as the lectotype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPhotonic and Optical Devices→French-language works237,207→