MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6892460248 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10667985

Acalypha levinii I. Montero & Cardiel

2023· article· en· W6892460248 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Diversity and Evolution
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSclerophyllMountain range (options)Endangered speciesGenusCritically endangeredEndemismTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

30. Acalypha levinii I.Montero & Cardiel South African Journal of Botany 146: 638 (Montero Muñoz et al. 2022). — Type: Madagascar. Haute Matsiatra region (Fianarantsoa prov.), Parc d’Ánja Community Reserve, E of RN7, c. 9.5 km of Ambalavao, 990 m, 21°51’7.5”S, 46°50’43.1”E, 29.XI.2012, L. J. Gillespie, G. A. Levin & J. Razanatsoa 19809 (holo-, CAN). — Paratypes: Madagascar. Haute Matsiatra region (Fianarantsoa prov.), Haute Matsiatra, Parc d’Ánja Community Reserve, E of RN7, c. 9.5 km of Ambalavao, 990 m, 21°51’6.1”S, 46°50’43.7”E, 29.XI.2012, L. J. Gillespie, G. A. Levin & J.Razanatsoa 19808 (CAN); Atsimo-Andrefana region (Toliara prov.), Beza Mahafaly Reserve, near Betioky, parcelle 1, Along the Sakamena river bank, 140 m, 23°38’60”S, 44°32’60”E, 2.XI.1987, P.B. Phillipson 2503 (K, MO, US, WAG); Plateau calcaire au N de la basse vallée du Fiherenana, 200-300 m, I.1947, H. Humbert 19866 (P [P00324585]). ICONOGRAPHY. — Montero Muñoz et al. (2022); Fig. 57B. ETYMOLOGY. — The epithet honors Dr. Geoffrey A. Levin, codirector of the first author’s PhD dissertation. He has published many articles about Acalypha and contributed to the knowledge of this genus worldwide. DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT. — Endemic to Madagascar (Atsimo-Andrefana and Haute Matsiatra). Degraded sclerophyllous woodland. On basement rocks and sandstone. Altitudinal range 140-990 m (Fig. 49). PRELIMINARY CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT. — Acalypha levinii is known from four collections from different localities. Its EOO is estimated to be 12 578 km 2 and its AOO 16 km 2, which is less than the 500 km 2 threshold of the B2 subcriterion of the Endangered category. This species grows in sclerophyllous woodlands in the highlands (see assessment of A. leptomyura). This species was collected in degraded forests and in both protected (community reserve and national reserve) and unprotected areas. Even in the reserves, the habitat of this species is subject to various threats (uncontrolled fires for grazing and crops), so ongoing habitat loss and degradation will cause continued decline of its EOO and AOO. Acalypha levinii is assessed as Endangered (EN): EN B2ab(ii,iii,iv). MATERIAL EXAMINED. — 4 collections. Madagascar: Gillespie, L. 10808 (CAN), 10809 (CAN); Humbert, H. 19866 (P[P00324585]); Phillipson, P.B. 2503 (K, MO, US[US01287331], WAG[WAG.1578523]). DESCRIPTION Shrubs, deciduous, to 2 m tall,divaricately branched,monoecious. Branches red-tinged, densely pubescent with simple, curved, antrorse trichomes, glabrescent when mature. Axillary buds spherical, to 1 mm diameter, perulate, perules 2, overlapping (superposed), membranous, brownish, sparsely hairy. Stipules to 4 mm long, lanceolate, apex acute, pubescent with simple, appressed trichomes. Petioles 1.5-3(-4) cm long, indumentum similar to that on young branches. Leaf blades (3.5-)4-6.5 × 2-3.3 cm, ovate-lanceolate to elliptic-lanceolate, membranous; base rounded to subcordate; apex slightly acuminate, acumen 10 mm long, rounded to subacute, mucronate; margin serrate to crenate, teeth subrounded, slightly reddish, callose-edged; upper surface laxly pubescent with simple, erect trichomes and subsessile reddish glandular trichomes; lower surface indumentum similar to that on upper surface but denser, axils of secondary veins with hair-tuft domatia; venation actinodromous, basal veins 3, secondary veins 5-6 per side. Stipels filiform, to 0.3 mm long, glabrous. Inflorescences spiciform, androgynous, and solitary female bracts, mainly axillary, some androgynous inflorescences terminal. Androgynous inflorescences to 4 cm long, mostly male with short female segment; subsessile,peduncle to 0.3 mm long; rachis indumentum similar to that on petiole. Female segment to 2.5 cm long; bracts 1-4, sessile to slightly petiolate, enlarging in fruit to 10 × 12 mm, oblate to suborbicular, indumentum similar to that on leaves and ciliate, glabrescent; margin dentate, teeth c. 15, rounded, callose-edged, slightly reddish, central tooth not prominent; bracteoles absent. Male segment persistent, to 2 cm long; flowers glomerate; bracts to 0.5 mm long, lanceolate, sparsely hairy. Solitary female bracts sessile, similar to those of androgynous inflorescences. Male flowers: pedicel to 0.5 mm long, sparsely hairy;buds to 0.8 mm diameter,sparsely hairy, papillose. Female flowers 1 per bract, sessile; sepals 3, to 0.5 mm long, triangular, sparsely hairy; ovary c. 1 mm diameter, 3-lobed, apparently smooth, surface hispid with simple, erect trichomes to 1 mm long; styles 3, to 4 mm long, slightly connate at base, sparsely hairy, each divided into c. 12 segments. Allomorphic flowers sometimes present at inflorescence apex; pedicel filiform, to 12 mm long, sparsely hairy; sepals 3, similar to those of normal flowers; ovary 1-lobed, to 1 mm diameter, hispid with simple, erect trichomes to 1 mm long; style 1, to 6 mm long, sparsely hairy. Capsules to 2.5 mm diameter, papillose-hispid, papillae rounded, surface densely pubescent with simple trichomes. Seeds c. 1.8 × 1.5 mm, subglobose, foveolate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPlant Diversity and EvolutionFrench-language works237,207