MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6892498976 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10278600

Licea belmontiana Nann.

2023· article· en· W6892498976 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetalBark (sound)DehiscenceReceptacleSpore

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

4. Licea belmontiana Nann. -Bremek., Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch., C. 69(3): 337 (1966). Figs. 4A–J Sporophores sporocarpic, dispersed or grouped, sessile. Sporocarps subglobose, angular, 0.05–0.2 mm diam., dark brown. Peridium apparently single, brown by TL with preformed dehiscence lines; dehiscence into polygonal plates that remain vertical like petals with smooth edges without outgrowths but minutely crenulate. Spores dark brown in mass, light brown with a slightly paler area by TL, subglose, 10–14 µm diam., apparently smooth. By SEM the peridium is double the inner surface of the peridium is ornamented with dense tiny warts (granular) that continue to the platelet margins, the margin is crenulated; the epispore is verrucate with irregularly sparsely spaced warts and some areas with no warts. Material examined: Holotypus. NETHERLANDS. Wageningen, Belmonte Botanic Gardens, on bark from an Acer sp. stump in moist chamber culture, 2-4-1965. NENB-5879 (BR-MYC 5020057898868)!. Habitat: on bark, trunks and stumps of angiosperms and gymnosperms. Distribution: Norway, Sweden, Russian Federation, Ukraine, Ireland, Netherlands, France, Switzerland, Germany, Italy, Spain, Greece, Malta, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, China, India, USA, Canada, Mexico, Guatemala, Paraguay, Argentina, Chile. Icon.: Nannenga-Bremekamp (1966: 337, Figs. 1 A – C; 1975: 64; 1991: 43), Neubert et al. (1993: 282, Pl. V: 1), Novozhilov et al. (1999: 84, Figs. 3 A – D), Yamamoto (2002b: 4, Figs. 2 A – C; 2006: 13, Figs. 4 A – C; 2021: 139, Figs. A – C), Novozhilov & Schnittler (2008: 108, Figs. 26–27), Schnittler et al. (2013: 101, Figs. 31–34 (as L. cf. belmontiana), Bortnikov et al. (2022: 25, Figs. 3a–k). Notes. This species was described as having smooth spores on the basis of light microscope examination available to its author at that time. However, our examination of the holotype by SEM has shown that the spores are not entirely smooth, since the epispore has some widely-spaced warts of different size (Fig. 4 I). In the original description the species is characterized as having a single peridium with included granular matter, but our SEM micrographs show (Fig. 4 H arrow), that the granular matter forms a complete layer, so the peridium is double. This fact was pointed out also by Novozhilov et al. (1999) for collections they ascribed to this species. The spore size in the original description was given as about 13 µm in diameter, but the author herself specified the wider range in her later expanded monographs (Nannenga-Bremekamp 1975, 1991, 2022). According to GBIF, there is a collection marked as isotypus in UPS BOT F 646101.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207