Bibliographic record
Abstract
Homocopris torulosus (Eschscholtz, 1822) Figs 9–10, 21–22, 29, 35, 38, 41, 45, 47, 49, 54, 61, 67 Copris torulosa Eschscholtz, 1822: 29 (original description). Copris valdiviana Philippi, 1859: 661 (original description). Pinotus torulosus var. minor Luederwaldt, 1925: 68 (original description) (uncertain status, see remarks below). Pinotus Dahli Landin, 1955: 5 (original description) syn. nov. Copris (Homocopris) torulosa – Burmeister 1846: [3] (mention). Copris torulosa – Solier 1851: 60 (monograph). Copris torulosus – Redtenbacher 1868: 55 (distribution). Pinotus torulosus – Harold 1869a: 133 (monograph); 1869b: 1011 (catalogue). — Waterhouse 1891: 361 (comment). — Bruch 1911: 187 (catalogue). — Gillet 1911: 62 (catalogue). — Joseph 1929: 31 (nidification). — Gutiérrez 1940: 277 (monograph). — Pereira 1941: 267 (checklist). — Blackwelder 1944: 208 (checklist). — Lange 19476: 313 (misidentification). [Copris] valdivianus – Harold 1869b: 1011 (synonymy). — Heyne 1900: 62 (synonym). — Gillet 1911: 62 (synonym). Copris valdivianus – Harold 1869a: 133 (synonym). — Reed 1876: 281 (synonym). — Bruch 1911: 187 (synonym). [Pinotus] torulosus – Reed 1876: 281 (catalogue). — Heyne 1900: 62 (diagnosis, distribution). Pinotus valdivianus – Waterhouse 1891: 361 (comment). Pinotus (P.) torulosus var. valdivianus – Luederwaldt 1929: 649 (monograph). Pinotus torulosus var. Minor – Luederwaldt 1929:649 (monograph).— Gutiérrez1940: 280 (monograph). — Blackwelder 1944: 208 (checklist). — Mondaca 2023: 223 (synonym). Pinotus (P.) torulosus – Luederwaldt 1929: 650 (monograph). Pinotus torulosus var. valdivianus – Gutiérrez 1940: 279 (monograph). — Blackwelder 1944: 208 (checklist). Pinotus torulosus minor – Lange 1947: 313 (biology, distribution). Dichotomius (D.) torulosus – Martínez 1959: 87 (catalogue). Dichotomius torulosus – Halffter & Matthews 1966: 7 (biology). — Halffter 1977: 242 (nidification). — Halffter & Edmonds 1982: 89 (biology). — Zunino 1983: 541 (classification). — Klemperer 1983: 61 (ecology). — Cabrera Walsh & Gandolfo 1996: 586 (nidification). [Dichotomius (D.) torulosus] var. minor – Vaz-de-Mello 2000: 193 (checklist). [Dichotomius (D.) torulosus] var. valdivianus – Vaz-de-Mello 2000: 193 (checklist). Homocopris torulosus – Vaz-de-Mello et al. 2010: 192 (new combination). — Jerez 2015: 1 (biology). — Ratcliffe et al. 2015: 197 (checklist). — González et al. 2015: 53 (ecology). — Tarasov & Génier 2015: 21 (phylogeny). — Tarasov & Dimitrov 2016: 7 (phylogeny). — Rebolledo et al. 2017: 27 (faunistic). — Tello et al. 2017: 61 (fossil); 2021: 139 (distribution). — Mondaca 2023: 223 (checklist, distribution). Copris valdiviana – Mondaca 2023: 223 (synonymy). Pinotus dahli – Mondaca 2023: 223 (synonym). Differential diagnosis Dorsal ocular width subequal to one-sixth interocular distance; lateral pronotal edge angular on anterior fourth in dorsal view; width of ellipse formed by lateral pronotal carina and edge approximately one third the elliptical length; posterior pronotal surface chagrined; elytral interstriae punctation visible at 10× magnification; metasternal depression entire, extending into anterior portion of median metasternal lobe. ♂ pronotal ridge with three sets of distinct bilaterally paired tubercles in large individuals; paramere apex acutely tipped; FLP endophallite elongate, bent, with internal angle adjacent to sclerotized extension. Name-bearing type data Copris torulosus Eschscholtz, neotype ♂, here designated (CMNC) (Fig. 54): “ CHILE: Malleco | 17kmWAngol, 800m | 8.XII.84 - 16.II.85 | S & JPeck, FIT | mixed Nothofagus ”; “WORLD | SCARAB. | DATABASE | WSD00035423” [barcode label]; “Southern Neotropical Scarabs | database # AS2599338 | Homocopris torulosus | (Eschscholtz, 1822) ♂ | DET: A.B.T.Smith 2005“ [with black border]; “N E O T Y P E ♂ | Copris | torulosus | Eschscholtz, 1822 | des. Génier & Darling, 2021” [on red card with black border.]. Pinotus torulosus var. minor Luederwaldt: no type material examined. Pinotus dahli Landin, allotype ♂ (MZLU) (Fig. 57): “ Chile ” [handwritten]; “Allotypus” [red card with black border]; “ Pinotus Dahli m. | allotype ♂ | B. O. Landin det” [partly handwritten]; “Photo 2018 | by MZLU”; “MZLU | Type no | 2775:2” [partly red]; “MZLU | 2018 | 001” [green paper]; “ZML.2005 | 202” [green paper]; “WORLD | SCARAB. | DATABASE | WSD00035268” [barcode label]; “Southern Neotropical Scarabs | database # AS2607242 | Homocopris torulosus | (Eschscholtz, 1822) ♂ | DET: A.B.T.Smith 2006”; “ Homocopris ♂ | torulosus | (Eschscholtz, 1822) | det. Génier & Darling, 2018”. Type locality 17 km W Angol (800 m), Malleco, Chile. Type material Neotype of Copris torulosus (present designation) CHILE • ♂ (Fig. 54); “ CHILE: Malleco | 17kmWAngol, 800m | 8.XII.84 - 16.II.85 | S & JPeck, FIT | mixed Nothofagus ”; “WORLD | SCARAB. | DATABASE | WSD00035423” [barcode label]; “Southern Neotropical Scarabs | database # AS2599338 | Homocopris torulosus | (Eschscholtz, 1822) ♂ | DET: A.B.T.Smith 2005“ [with black border]; “N E O T Y P E ♂ | Copris | torulosus | Eschscholtz, 1822 | des. Génier & Darling, 2021” [on red card with black border]; CMNC. Allotype of Pinotus dahli CHILE • ♂ (Fig. 57); “Chile” [handwritten]; “Allotypus” [red card with black border]; “ Pinotus Dahli M. | allotype ♂ | B. O. Landin det” [partly handwritten]; “Photo 2018 | by MZLU”; “MZLU | Type no | 2775:2” [partly red]; “MZLU | 2018 | 001” [green paper]; “ ZML.2005 | 202” [green paper]; “WORLD | SCARAB. | DATABASE | WSD00035268” [barcode label]; “Southern Neotropical Scarabs | database # AS2607242 | Homocopris torulosus | (Eschscholtz, 1822) ♂ | DET: A.B.T.Smith 2006”; “ Homocopris ♂ | torulosus | (Eschscholtz, 1822) | det. Génier & Darling, 2018”; MZLU. Paratype de Pinotus dahli CHILE • 1 ♀; same locality as for allotype; [no date]; [anonymous]; MZLU. Other material examined (163 ♂♂, 206 ♀♀) ARGENTINA – Río Negro • 1 ♂; El Bolsón; [41°58′ S, 71°32′ W]; Nov. 1967; [anonymous]; CPFA • 1 ♀; same locality as for preceding; [no date]; A. Kovács; NMPC • 1 ♀; same locality as for preceding; 1956; A. Kovács; NMPC • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; Dec. 1956; [anonymous]; NMPC. CHILE • 6 ♂♂, 1 ♀; [unspecified locality]; 1907; M.J. Rivera; MNHN • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; [no date]; M.J. Rivera; CMNC. – Región de Los Lagos • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; 11 km NW of Castro, Isla Chiloé; [42°24′ S, 73°51′ W]; 200 m; 27 Dec. 1984 – 1 Feb. 1985; S. and J. Peck; ravine second growth forest, carrion trap; CMNC • 1 ♂, 9 ♀♀; 13 km W of Entre Lagos; [40°37′30″ S, 72°44′0″ W]; 200 m; 21 Dec. 1984 – 8 Feb. 1985; S. and J. Peck; forest remnant, carrion trap; CMNC • 2 ♀♀; 34 km E of Puerto Montt, Lago Chapo; [41°25′ S, 72°35′ W]; 300 m; 24 Dec. 1984 – 2 Feb. 1985; S. and J. Peck; second growth Nothofagus, carrion trap; CMNC • 1 ♂; Ahori Alto; 21–23 Feb. 1988; 70 m; L. Masner; CNC • 1 ♀; Repucura forest trail, Anticura, Parque Nacional Puyehue; [40°40′ S, 72°10′30″ W]; 500 m; 19 Dec. 1984 – 6 Feb. 1985; S. and J. Peck; forest, carrion trap; CMNC • 1 ♂; Terao, 10 km S of Chonchi, Isla Chiloe; [42°43′1″ S, 73°38′47″ W]; 45 m; 12–13 Feb. 2005; [anonymous]; yellow pan trap; CMNC • 1 ♂; [unspecified locality]; 30 Jan. 2007; [anonymous]; CMD • 1 ♀; same locality as for preceding; 10 Feb. 2007; [anonymous]; CMD. – Región de Los Ríos • 3 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; 34 km WNW of La Union; [40°13′45″ S, 73°21′35″ W]; 700 m; 17 Dec. 1984 – 7 Feb. 1985; S. and J. Peck; mixed evergreen forest, carrion trap; CMNC • 3 ♂♂; Corral; [39°53′ S, 73°26′ W]; 14 Oct. 1913; R.H. Beck; CAS • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; 16 Oct. 1913; R.H. Beck; CAS • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; same locality as for preceding; 20 Oct. 1913; R.H. Beck; CAS • 1 ♂; Panguipulli; [39°38′20″ S, 72°20′30″ W]; Jan. 1952: [anonymous]; CMNC • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; 1927; [anonymous]; CAS • 2 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; Valdivia; [39°50′ S, 73°13′ W]; [no date]; [anonymous]; MNHN. – Región del Biobío • 1 ♀; 4 km SE of Recinto; [36°52′ S, 71°36′ W]; 700 m; 17 Dec. 1976; H.F. Howden; CMNC • 2 ♀♀; 40 km E of San Carlos; [36°33′ S, 71°34′ W]; 24 Dec. 1950; Ross and Michelbacher; CAS • 5 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; 60 km SE od Chillan, Thermas Road; [36°54′ S, 71°33′ W]; 1300 m; 7 Dec. 1984 – 19 Feb. 1985; S. and J. Peck; beech forest, flight interception trap; CMNC • 1 ♂; Arauco; [37°15′ S, 73°19′ W]; 15 Apr. 1965; Sanfeliu; CMNC • 1 ♀; Concepción; [36°48′ S, 73°1′ W]; [no date]; [anonymous]; CAS • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Contulmo; [38°1′ S, 73°14′ W]; 28 Mar. 1940; D.S. Bullock; CAS • 1 ♀; same locality as for preceding; 7 Jan. 1967; Sanfeliu; CNC • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; 10 Feb. 1967; T. Cekalovic; CNC • 7 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; same locality as for preceding; 10 Mar. 1969; Sanfeliu; CNC • 7 ♂♂, 1 ♀; same locality as for preceding; 20 Dec. 1969; T. Cekalovic; CNC • 1 ♀; Hulpencillo; [36°47′ S, 73°5′30″ W]; 20 Mar. 1964; T. Cekalovic; CNC • 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Invernada; [36°52′30″ S, 71°34′30″ W]; Mar. 1970; L.E. Peña; PMOC • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Las Trancas; [36°54′ S, 71°40′ W]; 1 Feb. 1974; L.E. Peña; PMOC • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Las Trancas, Curico; [36°54′ S, 71°30′ W]; 1 Mar. 1979; L.E. Peña; CMNC • 1 ♂; Los Castaños, Chillán, El Carmen; [36°37′30″ S, 72°5′0″ W]; 21 Nov. 2003; M. Snižek; NMPC • 1 ♂; Mulchén; [37°43′ S, 72°14′ W]; Jan. 1935; Gutiérrez; CMNC • 2 ♂♂; same locality as for preceding; Dec. 1935; Gutiérrez; CMNC • 3 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Recinto; [36°48′ S, 71°44′ W]; 1 Mar. 1971; [anonymous]; CPFA • 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Talcahuano; [36°45′ S, 73°6′ W]; 1841; Jacquinot; MNHN. – Región del Maule • 1 ♂; Fundo Malcho, Cordillera Parral; [36°19′ S, 71°25′ W]; Dec.1956; M. Rivera; CNC • 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; same locality as for preceding; May 1957; [anonymous]; CPFA • 1 ♀; same locality as for preceding; 1 May 1957; [anonymous]; CPFA • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; 11–20 Nov. 1964; M. Rivera; CNC • 2 ♀♀; Romehual, Cordillera Parral; 5–10 Nov. 1960; [anonymous]; CPFA • 1 ♂, 3 ♀♀; Vilches Alto, Talca; [35°36′ S, 71°4′ W]; Dec. 1973; J. Valencia; CMNC. – Región La Araucanía • 2 ♂♂; 10 mi NE of Pucón; [39°
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".