MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6892531815 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10868036

Fejér vármegye és környékének nappali lepkéi (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) The Butterflies of Fejér County, Hungary

2024· article· en· W6892531815 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsButterflyNymphalidaePieridaeContext (archaeology)Lycaenidae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The author has been observing butterflies and collecting data in Fejér County (Central Hungary) and its neighbouring areas since the late 1980s. So far, 133 butterfly species have been recorded in the county, 124 of which have been found during the author’s research and the observations of other lepidopterologists. Three species: Lampides boeti-cus, Leptotes pirithous and Lycaena alciphron have been observed in Fejér county for the first time. Two strictly protected species occur within the examined area: Colias chrysotheme and Apatura metis, while the third one, Coenonympha oe-dippus was last found more than 100 years ago. Euphydryas aurinia and Maculinea nausithous used to be very rare or unknown species to Fejér County, but have expanded their areas cosiderably in the last twenty years. In the examined area there are remarkable populations of Spialia orbifer, Parnassius mnemosyne, Pieris ergane, Colias chrysotheme, Maculinea nausithous, Euphdyras aurinia, Hipparchia semele and Chazara briseis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy→French-language works237,207→