MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6892535293 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10463334

Building Construction and Demolition Awareness: Encouraging a Waste Management Mindset in Saudi Arabia

2023· article· en· W6892535293 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRecycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemolitionMindsetHazardous wasteDemolition wastePillarLife expectancyConstruction wasteExpectancy theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Just like any other entity, buildings have a certain life span. Buildings are built with a life expectancy of roughly 80-100 years. Once reaching the end-of-life phase of the life cycle of a building, Demolition plans are drafted out with careful practice taking into consideration safety measures of the execution, extracting hazardous materials, and surveying the building before demolishing and as a result of this process, we are faced with an overwhelming amount of demolition waste that will most likely end up in landfills. This article aims to build awareness to encourage the adoption of future waste management plans in Saudi Arabia. It is divided into two parts. The first part will attempt to give a general review of the Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW), waste management methods, and factors that influence CDW generation. The second part takes a focused economic perspective of CDW.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.860

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicRecycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceFrench-language works237,207