MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6892552560 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.11259854

Grouping persistent and mobile substances to expedite assessments and avoid regrettable substitution

2024· article· en· W6892552560 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsHazardous wasteHazardPrioritizationHazard analysisClass (philosophy)Work (physics)Relation (database)Substitution (logic)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Introduction There is an interest by regulators and scientists working with chemical hazard assessment to transition from a one-substance-at-a-time approach to a substance-group approach. Two main motivations for this are to expedite hazard assessments related to the large amounts of substances being introduced to the global chemical market, and avoiding regrettable substitution caused by drop-in substitution. The idea of substance grouping based on the relationship between chemical structure and hazard has been applied in several cases already. Many of the very first hazardous organic substances to be regulated globally as pollutants were groups sharing a similar structure, including DDT-derivatives, dioxins, and PBDEs. This presentation will provide an overview of strategies for grouping hazardous substances based on chemical structure and how these substance grouping approaches may be applied in relation to persistent and mobile substances, as as these are a class of substances receiving increasing, global attention. This work will be particularly relevant to identify groups substances with either a common chemical moiety, or common transformation products, that are considered persistent, mobile and toxic (PMT) or very persistent and very mobile (vPvM) [1]. Since approaches are needed now to better assess and regulate them to protect drinking water sources, we explore how grouping persistent and mobiles substances based on specific molecular substructures will support PMT/vPvM substance prioritization for risk governance and assessments. 2. Materials and Methods Two approaches of substance grouping are being considered for persistent and mobile substances: Method 1: common chemcial substructure; and Method 2: precursors leading to common transformation products. Method 1 has some similarities with the concept of read across, where properties of a substance (i.e. of physico-chemical and/or biological properties) are linked to chemical structure [2]. Specifically, the approach will be to first obtain persistency and mobility information for as many substances on the global chemical inventory as possible. Following this, a statistical analysis of common moieties amongst persistent and mobile substances vs non persistent and mobile substances will be conducted. Additional considerations, such as exclusion rules based on molecular volume (for mobility) or percentage of well-known degradable moieties (e.g. alkyl chains), will be included within the statisical analysis. Method 2 is based on “dead-end transformation pathways”, referring to transformation products that can be generated from multiple substances that are found to be persistent, and not prone to further degradation. Transformation products often tend to be more mobile than their precusors. The approach here is to use literature transformation pathways, in combination with digital tools like BioTransformer [3] and enviPath [4] (which predict metabolites through combinations of rule-based and machine learning approaches) to identify transformation products that remain persistent and mobile in the environment. 3. Results and Discussion 1. 2. 3. An early approach to develop these two methods was two consider the case of substances with a 1,2,4-triazole moiety. The Method 1 approach was to consider 1,2,4-triazole as a persistent and mobile moeity because the substance itself is persistent and mobile, and many smaller molecules containing this moeity were also persistent and mobile (e.g. triazole acetic acid, triazole analine). The method 2 approach is based on analysis of transformation pathways in PubChem that many of the larger substances containing this moeity, including ones that themselves are not persistent and mobile, had 1,2,4 triazole as common transformation product. Further many of the substances in Figure 1 are considered to be toxic, including the ultimate degardation product 1,2,4-triazole itself (toxic to reproduction). To identify more substance groups like this, cheminformatics approaches are being developed to streamline the process. Since the availability of reaction data is still hampering prediction quality, an app called “ShinyTPs” [5] was developed to curate and FAIRify existing text-mined transformation information within the PubChem database. This application facilitates the curation of the extracted reactions for upload to open datasets and to provide more data to improve the predictive approaches such as BioTransformer and enviPath. Currently interdisciplinary discussions are ongoing to find the best approaches for the prioritizaiton of persistent and mobile substance groups, towards risk assessment, prevention measures and remova . 4. Conclusions Regulating substances as groups has helped successfully phase out ecotoxic chemicals and persistent organic pollutants through the Montreal Protocol and Stockholm Convention. Thus, there is much potential for successfully developed grouping strategies for regulating PMT/vPvM substances, including those based on transformation products. Further discussions related to priorized persisent and mobile substance groups can be developed around policies relevant to the phase-out of the manufacture, use, and emission of PMT/vPvM substances in the environment. These policies include substituting harmful groups with less harmful ones and the safe and sustainable by-design approach. Such an approach can help guide fossuing alternanatives assessment, regulation, market transition, risk assessment and technological solutions towards green, transformative strategies toward zero pollution of persistent and mobile substances. 5. References [1] Arp, H.P.H. and Hale, S.E. (2022) "Assessing the Persistence and Mobility of Organic Substances to Protect Freshwater Resources", ACS Environ. Au 2022, 2, 6, 482–509. DOI:10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00024. [2] ECHA (2013) “Grouping of substances and read-across approach” . ECHA-13-R-02-EN [3] Wishart Lab (2023) https://biotransformer.ca/ (accessed 24/11/2023) [4] enviPath UG & co (2023) https://envipath.org/ (accessed 24/11/2023) [5] Palm, E. H., Chirsir, P., Krier, J., Thiessen, P. A., Zhang, J., Bolton, E. E., & Schymanski, E. L. (2023). ShinyTPs: Curating transformation products from text mining results. Environ. Sci. Technol. Letters, 10(10), 865-871. DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00537

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals→French-language works237,207→