THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BRAZILIAN SPACE SECTOR AND THE SPACE GEOPOLITICAL ADVANTAGE: FROM THE BARRIER OF HELL TO ALCANTARA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the end of the Second World War, Brazil has sought to develop technology in the aeronautical and space field. To this end, it sought to leverage its incipient industry through international cooperation with Germany, Canada, the United States and France. The highlighted project in the seventies was the Black Brandt rocket, Alcântara. The main objective of this work is to show the geopolitical importance of Brazil for the launch of space vehicles and the Brazilian effort to leverage the aerospace cluster. The methodological approach adopted is historical analysis of content, analytical and qualitative work. The sources used were mainly based on documents and periodicals of the time, as well as bibliographical research in the area of defense and space. Thus, we analyzed the beginnings of the Brazilian Space Program until the installation of the Alcântara Launch Center (CLA). The result of the analysis demonstrates that Brazil had many difficulties in implementing the space system, having to establish partnerships with other countries in search of technical knowledge, scientists, specialized materials and facing all types of resistance and international competition, but it has an important advantage: its geographic location.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".