MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6892574087 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10667972

Acalypha lamiana I. Montero & Cardiel

2023· article· fr· W6892574087 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant chemical constituents analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndemismDeciduousMountain range (options)Range (aeronautics)Genus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

24. Acalypha lamiana (Leandri) I.Montero & Cardiel PhytoKeys 108: 101 (Montero Muñoz et al. 2018a). — Acalypha reticulata var. urophylla f. lamiana Leandri, Notulae Systematicae. Herbier du Muséum de Paris. Phanérogramie. Paris 10: 263 (Leandri 1942). — Type: Madagascar. Prov. Mahajanga, Réserve de Marohogo, 28.XII.1938, H. J. Lam & A. D. J. Meeuse 6127 (lecto-, designated by Montero Muñoz et al. [2018a: 102]: P [P05604417]; isolecto-, L [L0242109]). — Former syntypes: Madagascar. Prov. Antananarivo, Tsarasaotra, II.1898, H. Perrier de la Bâthie 457 (P [P05604408, P05604409, P05604410, P05604413]); Prov. Fianarantsoa, Ankirihitra près du mont Tsiltondroina, III.1902, H. Perrier de la Bâthie 9817 (P [P05604403]), 9817 bis (P [P05604404, P05604405]); Prov. Mahajanga, NW of Ankazobe, Vallée de l’Ikopa, 14.III.1930, R. Decary 7535 (P [P05604421]); Massif de l’Ankarafantsika, 11.I.1938, R. Decary 12876 (P [P05604420]); Bekodoka, 17.IX.1930, R. Decary 8109 (P [P05604422]); Région d’Antsalova, 1932-1933, J. Leandri 998 (P [P05604411]); Tsingy du Bemaraha, 3-6.X.1932, J. Leandri 176 (P [P05604415]); Dokolahy, II-IV.1933, J. Leandri 602 (P [P05604414]); Prov. Toliara, Soahazo Forest, 100 m, 22.X.1932, J. Leandri 414 (P [P05604416]). ICONOGRAPHY. — Leandri (1942: 263); Figs 41; 46D. ETYMOLOGY. — The epithet honors Dutch botanist Herman Johannes Lam (1892-1977). DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT. — Endemic to Madagascar (Boeny, Melaky, Bongolava, Menabe, Atsimo-Andrefana, and Anosy). Dry deciduous forest, secondary grasslands, and pastures (savanna). Frequently on Mesozoic limestone. Altitudinal range (25-) 100-800 (-1200) m (Fig. 42). PRELIMINARY CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT. — The EOO of Acalypha lamiana is estimated to be 376 831 km 2 and its AOO 120 km 2, which is less than the 500 km 2 threshold of the B2 subcriterion of the Endangered category. This species grows mainly in the western dry deciduous forests (see comments in A. diminuta). It has been collected in some protected areas, but it is also known from several unprotected forests subject to various threats (uncontrolled fires for grazing and crops, logging, mining, etc.). Ongoing habitat loss will cause continued decline of its EOO and AOO. Acalypha lamiana is assessed as Near Threatened (NT) under criterion B. It meets the AOO values needed for a threatened category, but the number of locations is too high to meet the conditions required for a listing under the Endangered category. MATERIAL EXAMINED. — 50 collections. Madagascar. Afzelius, K. 81 (P[P00508497]); Baron, R. 6808 (K); Boivin, L.H. s.n. (K[K000186503]); Bolliger, R.F. RFB 083 (G[G00340310]); Capuron, R. 1935 (P[P04804747]), 1953 (P[P04779856, P04779858, P04779859]); Decary, R. 8109 (P[P05604422]), 8161 (K, P[P00324533]), 12876 (P[P05604420]), 15198 (P[P00508466]), 15725 (G, MA, P[P05547224]), 17069 (P[P05510110, P00324526]); Gillespie, L. 4141 (K, MO, P[P00513154], US[US01287449]), 10691 (MO), 10701 (CAN), 10702 (CAN), 10703 (CAN), 10832 (CAN); Harmelin 10247 (P[P04804764]); Humbert, H. 5102 (P[P04779863]), 12638 (P[P00508441, P00508442]), 12644 (P[P04804526, P04804527]), 19738 (P[P00508432]), 19990 (P[P00508431]), 20005 (P[P04779862]); Lam, H.J. 6127 (L[L0242109], P[P05604417]), bis 27 (P[P05604418]); Leandri, J. 176 (P[P05604415]), 414 (P[P05604416], US[US01287453]), 602 (P[P05604414]), 998 (P[P05604411]), 2060 (P[P04804746]), 2652 (P[P05543667, P00324505]), 2711 (G, K, P[P04804745]), 2856 (G, K, MO[MO-2965757], P[P04779857]), 2921 (P[P04779855]), 3018 (P[P04804744]), 4252 (P[P04804750]), s.n. (P[P05604419]); Nicoll, M.F. 377 (K, MO, P[P05604412]); Nusbaumer, L. LN 875 (K), LN 3084 (BR [BR0000015215604V], G[G00376211], MO[MO-2965725]); Perrier de la Bâthie, H. 457 (P[P05604408, P05604409, P05604410, P05604413]), 9817 (P[P05604403]), 9817 bis (P[P05604404, P05604405]); Rakotomalaza, P.J. 280 (P[P05516018]); Rakotovao, C. 4638 (P[P04804767]), 6237 (G, MO[MO-2965731], TAN); Ravelonarivo, D. 4528 (MO); Thunberg s.n. (S[S17-37572]). REFERENCES. — Montero Muñoz et al. (2018a: 101). DESCRIPTION Shrubs, probably deciduous, to 3 m tall, monoecious. Branches laxly pubescent with curved, antrorse trichomes, glabrous when mature. Axillary buds ovoid, to 1 × 0.5 mm, perulate, perules 2, valvate, membranous, blackish, glabrous. Stipules to 6 mm long, triangular, subglabrous, with some hyaline trichomes to 1 mm long, margin papillate. Petioles filiform, 1-2.5(-4) cm long, indumentum similar to that on young branches. Leaf blades 5-7 × 2-2.5(-3.5) cm, ovate-lanceolate to elliptic-lanceolate, membranous; base rounded to obtuse, rarely subcuneate; apex acuminate, acumen to 10 mm long, acute; margin serrulate, reddish, teeth minute, sometimes with simple trichome at apex; upper surface subglabrous, with some simple, appressed trichomes at base of midrib; lower surface subglabrous, with some sparse, simple trichomes; margins sparsely ciliate; venation actinodromous, basal veins 3, secondary veins 4-5 per side. Stipels glandular, to 0.5 mm diameter, glabrous. Inflorescences spiciform, androgynous, and solitary female bracts, axillary. Androgynous inflorescences to 4 cm long, mostly male with short female segment; sessile, rachis filiform, subglabrous, with some curved trichomes at base. Female segment: bracts 1-(4), sessile, enlarging in fruit to 7 × 6 mm, subrounded, glabrous; margin slightly crenate-dentate, revolute, reddish, teeth rounded, central tooth sometimes prominent; sterile bracts sometimes present, similar to regular female bracts, to 11 × 9 mm; bracteoles absent. Male segment persistent, to 3 cm long; flowers glomerate; bracts to 0.3 mm long, triangular, sparsely hairy. Solitary female bracts sessile, similar to those on androgynous inflorescences. Male flowers: pedicel to 0.5 mm long, sparsely hairy; buds to 0.7 mm diameter, glabrous. Female flowers 1 per bract, sessile; sepals 3, to 0.5 mm long, triangular, glabrous; ovary c. 1 mm diameter, 3-lobed, papillose-hispid, papillae on middle of each carpel, ending in simple trichome to 0.6 mm long, surface glabrous; styles 3, to 3 mm long, distinct, sparsely hairy, each divided into c. 10 segments. Allomorphic flowers sometimes present, axillary; pedicel filiform, to 19 mm long, glabrous; sepals to 0.5 mm long, triangular, glabrous; ovary 1-lobed, to 1.5 mm diameter, densely pubescent, distally fimbriate; style 1, to 4 mm long, glabrous. Capsules to 3 mm diameter, papillose-hispid, papillae similar to that on ovary, surface glabrous. Seeds c. 1.5 × 1.2 mm, pyriform, foveolate. NOTES 1) Acalypha lamiana was treated by Leandri (1942) as a form of A. reticulata var. urophylla (treated here as A. urophylla). After studying the type collections, it seems clear to us that A. lamiana must be considered a distinct species (Montero Muñoz et al. (2018a). Acalypha lamiana differs from A. urophylla mainly by the leaves that are rounded at the base and reddish at the margins, and its subentire, eglandular female bracts vs leaves that are usually rounded to subcordate, sometimes acute, at the base and not reddish at the margins, and dentate female bracts with small sessile glands at the margins in A. urophylla; 2) one of the former syntypes, H. Perrier de la Bâthie 9817, was wrongly transcribed by Leandri (1942: 263) as “ 8917 ”; and 3) many specimens bear malformed leaves, apparently due to insect damage or galls.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.393
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPlant chemical constituents analysisFrench-language works237,207