MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6892595586 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10592788

Lasioglossum (Sphecodogastra) dilisena Hettiarachchi & Gibbs 2024

2024· article· en· W6892595586 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeSubgenusMountWoodland

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Sphecodogastra) dilisena sp. nov. Figs. 7, 8B, 9B, 10B, 11C, 11D, 12, 13 Etymology. The specific epithet ‘dilisena’ is derived from the Sinhala word ‘dilisena’, which means ‘shining’, but is used here as a noun in apposition. This name was chosen because all three species described in this paper have an unusual metallic reflection on the mesosoma that is not seen in other known North American species in the subgenus Sphecodogastra. The first author is also a native speaker of Sinhala from Sri Lanka. Sinhala language is one of the official and national languages of Sri Lanka and the mother tongue of the majority people of Sri Lanka. Through this naming choice, we hope to honour all the linguistic and cultural diversity of the world. Holotype. USA — California • ♀; Santa Clara Co., 8 mi. E of Mount Hamilton [37.3416° N, 121.4964° W]; 16 April 1955; D.J. Burdick leg.; UCRC GIBBS- 11531. [Verbatim label: Calif: Sta. Clara Co., Mt. Hamilton, 8mi. E. VI-16-55 / D.J. Burdick Collector // Lasioglossum GIBBS- 11531 // Holotype / Lasioglossum (Sphecodogastra) dilisena Hettiarachchi and Gibbs] Paratypes. USA — California • 1 ♀; Alameda Co., Arroyo Mocho; 37.5839° N, 121.6297° W; 09 Apr 1957; D.J. Burdick leg.; EMEC • 3 ♀♀; Santa Clara Co., 5 mi. E of Mount Hamilton; [37.3414° N, 121.5505° W]; 16 Apr 1955; D.J. Burdick leg.; UCRC • 1 ♀; Santa Clara Co., 8 mi. E of Mount Hamilton; [37.3416° N, 121.4964° W]; 16 Apr 1955; D.J. Burdick leg.; EMEC • 21 ♀♀; Santa Clara Co., 8 mi. E of Mount Hamilton; [37.3416° N, 121.4964° W]; 16 Apr 1955; D.J. Burdick leg.; UCRC • 1 ♀; Santa Clara Co., 11 mi. E of Mount Hamilton; [37.3386° N, 121.4419° W]; 19 Apr 1956; D.J. Burdick leg.; UCRC • 1 ♀; Sierra Co., 5 mi. NNE Sierra City; [39.6332° N, 120.5981° W]; 07 Sep 1964; J. Bedea leg.; OSAC • 6 ♀♀; Mariposa Co., 5.5 mi. N of Coulterville; [37.7892° N, 120.1902° W]; 18 July 1963; R.W. Thorp leg.; ex Clarkia dudleyana; EMEC • 1 ♀; Tulare Co., 4 mi. N of Kaweah; [36.5278° N, 118.9182° W]; 13 May 1963; C. A. Toschi leg.; UCRC • 1 ♀; Tulare Co., Three Rivers; [36.4386° N, 118.9044° W]; elev. 265 m.; 10 June 1925; P.H. Timberlake leg.; ex Penstemon sp.; UCRC • 2 ♀♀; Tulare Co., Coffee Camp; [36.1519° N, 118.7425° W]; elev. 620 m.; 17 June 1953; P.H. Timberlake leg.; ex Clarkia purpurea subsp. viminea (verbatim: Godetia viminea); UCRC • 3 ♀♀; Kern Co., Miracle Hot Springs; [35.5756° N, 118.5344° W]; elev. 725 m.; 29 April 1964; J. Powell leg; UCRC. Description Female. Length 5.66 (± 0.42 SD) mm (n=6). Head length 1.57 (± 0.04 SD) mm (n=16). Head width 1.65 (± 0.06 SD) mm (n=6). Wing length 4.20 (± 0.19 SD) mm (n=16). Colouration. Head and mesosoma dark brown to black, mesoscutum and mesoscutellum with an oily metallic sheen with variable reflections; most specimens with a green reflection, while some display a green-purple mixture and others with a greater prominence of purple reflection around the parapsidal line and its vicinity. Clypeus apex dark brown. Labrum dark brown. Mandible brown basally, light brown apically with reddish brown apex. Flagellum brown dorsally, light brown ventrally. Pronotal lobe brown to reddish brown. Tegula yellowish brown. Wing membrane hyaline, faintly dusky, veins with subcosta brown, otherwise honey-coloured. Legs brown. Metasoma dark brown, apical margins reddish brown to narrowly testaceous. Pubescence. Setae off-white. Tomentum dense on pronotal angle and lobe, space between pronotal lobe and tegula, T 2– T 3 basolaterally; moderately dense on metanotum; scattered on T 4– T 5; partially obscuring metepisternum. Head and mesosoma with mostly sparse pilosity, composed of highly plumose setae with very short fine setae intermixed. Lateral surface of propodeum with sparse erect setae; plumose patch on dorsal area; very short fine hairs intermixed. Metafemoral scopa with dense plumose hairs. Wing hairs pale. T 1 with sparse erect setae. Surface sculpture. Clypeus shiny, becoming imbricate basally; punctures large, irregularly spaced (IS <PD) on apical third, smaller and denser on near basal margin (IS ≤ 1 PD). Supraclypeal area imbricate basolaterally, mostly becoming weakly or moderately imbricate medially; punctures dense laterally (IS ≤ 1 PD) and moderately dense to moderately sparse (IS = 1–2 PD) medially. Paraocular area imbricate to reticulate; punctures dense (IS ≤ 1 PD) to crowded (IS = 0 PD). Frons punctate-reticulate; punctures crowded (IS = 0 PD) or dense (IS <1 PD). Vertex imbricate laterally, strongly so medially; punctures absent or obscure. Gena shiny dorsally, becoming finely lineate ventrally; punctures fine, sparse (IS = 1–3 PD). Postgena shiny, becoming tessellate posteriorly. Tegula mostly shiny and impunctate except the base. Tegula base imbricate with punctures absent or obscure. Mesoscutum shiny, becoming tessellate to imbricate anteromedially; punctures large and small intermixed, mostly dense on marginally and on median line (IS <1 PD), sparser submedially, becoming shallow and indistinct anteromedially. Punctures mesad of parapsidal line (IS = 1–3 PD) slightly sparser than laterad of parapsidal line (IS = 1–2 PD), becoming closer submedially and adjacent to medial line (IS ≤ 1 PD). Mesoscutellum shiny; punctures dense marginally and on median line (IS ≤ 1 PD), sparser submedially (IS = 2–4 PD), diversopunctate. Metanotum shiny and becoming weakly rugulose laterally, densely punctate medially (IS ≤ 1 PD). Metapostnotum rugae strong, anastomosing, reaching at the middle of posterior margin; sculpture shiny to imbricate. Preëpisternum rugose. Hypoepimeron weakly rugulose; punctures dense (IS <1 PD), or sometime obscure, and sometime there are few scattered minute punctures anteriorly. Mesepisternum rugose mostly throughout; punctures obscure dorsally, absent ventrally. Metepisternum ruguloso-lineate dorsally, imbricate ventrally. Propodeum lateral face imbricate anteriorly and dorsally, otherwise tessellate; posterior face tessellate. T 1 anterior face shiny, punctures small and very sparse; T 1 dorsal surface shiny, becoming weakly coriarious on rim, punctures small, sparse (IS = 1–4 PD), very sparse in large subapicolateral boss, and absent on rim. T 2 disc imbricate to coriarious; punctures moderately dense basally (IS = 1–2 PD), becoming abruptly sparse apically (IS = 1–3 PD); rim coriarious; rim punctures absent (short hairs present but these not arising from distinct punctures). Structure. Face length/width ratio 0.81 (± 0.02 SD). Eyes convergent below [UOD/LOD ratio 1.03 (± 0.03 SD)]. Clypeus projecting ~66% below suborbital tangent; clypeal area length/width ratio 0.83 (± 0.05 SD). Gena narrower than eye. Protibial spur with apical serrations as long as width of malus. Inner metatibial spur pectinate, branches mostly shorter than width of rachis (Figs. 11C, 11D). Intertegular span 1.14 (± 0.08 SD) mm. Distance between parapsidal line (at the starting point) 0.87 (± 0.08 SD) mm. Pronotal angle obtuse. Mesoscutum length/width ratio 0.88 (± 0.03 SD); mesoscutum/mesoscutellum length ratio 2.84 (± 0.16 SD); mesoscutellum/metanotum length ratio 1.54 (± 0.19 SD). Propodeum lateral carinae reaching dorsal margin; oblique carina very strong. (n=18) Male. Unknown Range. Diablo and Sierra Nevada mountain ranges of California (Figs. 7, 13). Floral hosts. ONAGRACEAE: Clarkia dudleyana (Abrams) J.F.Macbr., Clarkia purpurea subsp. viminea (Douglas ex Hook.) H. Lewis & M. Lewis • PLANTAGINACEAE: Penstemon sp.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207