Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Homocopris Burmeister, 1846 [Copris] (Homocopris) Burmeister, 1846: [3] (original description). [Copris] (Homocopris) – Lacordaire 1855: 97 (synonymy). Homocopris – Harold 1869b: 1009 (synonym). — Heyne 1900: 62 (synonym). — Gillet 1911: 59 (synonym). — Lucas 1920: 333 (catalogue, synonym). — Blackwelder 1944: 206 (synonym). — Martínez 1959: 80 (synonym); 1987: 64 (synonym).— Woodruff 1973: 53 (synonym). — Ratcliffe 2002: 15 (synonym). — Smith 2003: 28 (synonym). — Vaz-de-Mello et al. 2010: 192 (new rank); 2011: 13 (identification key). — Sarmiento-Garcés & Amat-García 2014: 25 (synonym). — Chamorro et al. 2018: 77 (identification key); 2019: 158 (catalogue, faunistic). Type species Copris torulosus Eschscholtz, 1822, by original monotypy. Differential diagnosis Dorsal ocular width subequal to one-sixth interocular distance. Lateral pronotal carina anteriorly joined with pronotal edge only anteriorly. Eighth elytral stria always absent. Meso-metasternal suture straight (Fig. 61). Posteromedial surface of metasternum deeply impressed. ♂ pronotal armament forming bilaterally paired tubercles along an inclined ridge in large individuals. FLP endophallite elongate and curved or reduced and rounded. Description Body length 12–22 mm. Anteroventral clypeal tooth rather broad. Dorsal ocular width subequal to one-sixth interocular distance. Anterior pronotal membrane rather wide, transition between membrane and anterior edge of pronotum well-defined throughout. Anterior pronotal edge sinuous medially. Anteromedial pronotal surface chagrined or rugose. Lateral pronotal carina and pronotal edge distinct anteriorly only. Anterior apex of prosternum acutely tipped. Underside of elytron with long semi-erected setae. Eighth elytral stria always absent. Hindwing AP entire, converging with J. Meso-metasternal suture straight. Surface of median metasternal lobe lacking setae, deeply impressed, with uneven texture. Pygidial surface coarsely punctate. ♂ pronotal armament forming bilaterally paired tubercles along inclined ridge in large individuals. Paramere in one of two forms: (1) sharply tapered and acutely tipped, with length equivalent to or greater than 2 mm, or (2) gently tapered and apically rounded, with length never exceeding 2 mm. FLP endophallite elongate and curved or reduced and rounded. Distribution Chilean and Argentinean Andes, and montane Atlantic Forest in southeast and south Brazil. Remarks The description of Homocopris was published by Burmeister in Genera quaedam insectorum. Iconibus illustravit et descripsit. Volumen I. Continet tabulas XL. This work was issued in 10 fascicules from 1838 to 1846 (Bousquet 2016). The genus Copris in which Homocopris was described as a subgenus was treated on an unnumbered page in the last fascicule published (Hefte 10). Some authors have cited the date of publication of the genus as 1838–1846 (Martínez 1959) or as 1842 (Woodruff 1973; Smith 2003; Sarmiento-Garcés & Amat-García 2014). However, all evidence supports a publication date between July and December 1846 (Bousquet 2016).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".