MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6892688248 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10667991

Acalypha mayottensis I. Montero & Cardiel

2023· article· en· W6892688248 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Diversity and Evolution
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndemismArchipelagoProtected areaRange (aeronautics)RainforestNew guinea

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

34. Acalypha mayottensis I.Montero & Cardiel PhytoKeys 140: 65 (Montero Muñoz et al. 2020b). — Type: Mayotte. Mamoudzou commune, îlot M’bouzi, 12°48’50”S, 45°14’08”E, 10-50 m, 22.XI.2000, J.-N. Labat, F. Barthelat, C.M. Hladik & A.B. Sifary 3268 (holo-, G [G00034240]; iso-, K, MAO, MO [MO-2965774], P [P00209719]). — Paratypes: Mayotte. Mamoudzou commune, îlot M’Bouzi, 12°48’57”S, 45°14’06”E, 90 m, 22.XI.2000, J.-N. Labat, F. Barthelat, C.M. Hladik & A.B. Sifary 3272 (G [G00034255], K, MAO, MO [MO-2966248], P [P00209724, P00209725]); îlot M’Bouzi, 12°48’39”S, 45°14’06”E, 26.XII.2002, F. Barthelat, A. de Vanssay & G. Rembert 1112 (MAO, P [P00339165]). — Precise location unknown, probably from M’Bouzi islet, 01.I.2010, G. Viscardi 310 (HKM, P [P02439826]). ICONOGRAPHY. — Montero Muñoz et al. (2020b); Figs 54F; 57E. ETYMOLOGY. — The epithet refers to Mayotte island, to which the small Mbouzi islet belongs, and to which this species appears to be endemic. DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT. — Endemic to Comoros Archipelago (Mayotte). Dry forest and secondary forest. Altitudinal range 10- 90 m (Fig. 53). PRELIMINARY CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT. — Acalypha mayottensis is only known from Mbouzi islet. Its EOO and AOO are estimated to be 8 km 2. Mbouzi islet was declared a “Réserve Naturelle Nationale” in 2007, a category IV protected area (Dudley 2008). In the 1990s the islet had lost 70% of its original forests to agriculture. Mbouzi now conserves 10% of its natural and secondary forest. Currently, the most serious threat are invasive species, both animals, such as Eulemur fulvus, and plants, such as Antigonon leptopus, Lantana strigocamara, Leucaena leucocephala, Litsea glutinosa, Spathodea campanulata and Furcraea foetida (Boullet & Traclet 2018; Quintard et al. 2019). Due to its restricted geographic range and the threats from alien species, A. mayottensis is assigned a preliminary conservation status of Critically Endangered: CR B2ab(ii,iii). MATERIAL EXAMINED. — 4 collections. Mayotte. Barthelat, F. 1112 (MAO, P[P00339165]); Labat, J.-N. 3268 (G[G00034240], K, MAO, MO[MO-2965774], P[P00209719]), 3272 (G[G00034255], K, MAO, MO[MO-2966248], P[P00209724, P00209725]); Viscardi, G. 310 (P[P02439826]). DESCRIPTION Shrubs, deciduous, to 5 m tall, monoecious. Branches laxly pubescent with simple, erect trichomes to 1 mm long, glabrous when mature. Axillary buds ovoid, to 3 × 2.3 mm, perulate, perules 2, imbricate, chartaceous, blackish, glabrous. Stipules to 6 mm long, linear to triangular-lanceolate, becoming filiform when mature, margins scarious, sparsely hairy, glabrescent, and with some glands. Petioles slender, (2-)3-5(-6) cm long, pubescent with simple, curved, antrorse trichomes. Leaf blades 5-10 × 3-6 cm, ovate-lanceolate to elliptic-lanceolate, membranous; base rounded to subcordate; apex subacuminate to acuminate, acumen to 15 mm long, rounded; margin crenulate-serrulate to subentire, slightly revolute, teeth rounded; upper surface pubescent with simple, thin, erect trichomes, glabrescent; lower surface indumentum similar to that on upper surface but denser; axils of secondary veins with minute, sparsely hairy, pocket-shaped domatia, sometimes with hair-tuft domatia; margins ciliate in sinuses; venation actinodromous, basal veins 3, secondary veins 4-6 per side. Stipels absent. Inflorescences spiciform androgynous, axillary, to 6 cm long, mostly male with short female segment; peduncle thick, to 15 mm long, laxly pubescent with trichomes similar to those on young branches, glabrescent. Female segment to 2.5 cm long; bracts 1-2, sessile, enlarging in fruit to 19 × 21 mm, subreniform, veins and margin sparsely hairy with simple, erect trichomes to 1.5 mm long, glabrescent; margin crenate to subentire, sometimes dentate in young bracts, central tooth not prominent; bracteoles absent. Male segment persistent, to 4 cm long; flowers glomerate; bracts to 0.5 mm long, triangular, sparsely hairy. Male flowers: pedicel to 1 mm long, glabrous; buds to 0.7 mm diameter, sparsely hairy with simple, arachnoid trichomes. Female flowers 1 per bract, sessile; sepals 3[4], to 0.7 mm long, ovate-triangular, sparsely hairy with simple, arachnoid trichomes; ovary c. 1 mm diameter, 3-lobed, echinate, projections and surface hispid; styles 3, to 3 mm long, distinct, rachis thick, appressed-pubescent, each divided into 8-10 segments. Allomorphic flowers not seen. Capsules to 4 mm diameter, erinaceous projections conical, subacute, to 1 mm long, they and surface hispid with simple, erect trichomes to 1 mm long. Seeds 2.5 × 2 mm, pyriform, minutely foveolate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPlant Diversity and EvolutionFrench-language works237,207