Tamias (Neotamias) minimus Bachman 1839
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tamias (Neotamias) minimus Bachman 1839 Tamias (Neotamias) minimus Bachman 1839, J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 8: 71. Type Locality: "Green River, near mouth of Big Sandy Creek, [Sweetwater Co.,] Wyo[ming]." [USA]. Vernacular Names: Least Chipmunk. Subspecies:: Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) minimus subsp. minimus Bachman 1839 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) minimus subsp. atristriatus V. Bailey 1913 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) minimus subsp. borealis J. A. Allen 1877 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) minimus subsp. cacodemus Cary 1906 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) minimus subsp. caniceps Osgood 1900 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) minimus subsp. caryi Merriam 1908 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) minimus subsp. confinis A. H. Howell 1925 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) minimus subsp. consobrinus J. A. Allen 1890 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) minimus subsp. grisescens A. H. Howell 1925 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) minimus subsp. hudsonius Anderson and Rand 1944 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) minimus subsp. neglectus J. A. Allen 1890 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) minimus subsp. operarius Merriam 1905 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) minimus subsp. oreocetes Merriam 1897 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) minimus subsp. pallidus J. A. Allen 1874 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) minimus subsp. pictus J. A. Allen 1890 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) minimus subsp. scrutator Hall and Hatfield 1934 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) minimus subsp. selkirki Cowan 1946 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) minimus subsp. silvaticus White 1952 Distribution: C Yukon (Canada) south through Sierra Nevada and S New Mexico, east to Michigan (USA) and W Quebec (Canada). Conservation: IUCN – Critically Endangered as T. m. atristriatus, Vulnerable as T. m. selkirki, otherwise Lower Risk (lc). Discussion: Subgenus Neotamias. Southern Rocky Mtn populations revised by Sullivan (1985). Reviewed by Verts and Carraway (2001, Mammalian Species No. 653).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".