Badhamia semiannulata Raub & H. W. Keller 1979
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Badhamia semiannulata Raub & H.W. Keller, in Raub, Keller & Gaither, Mycologia 71(1):120 (1979) Paratypus: CANADA. Ontario, Byron, on greenhouse mulch, 21 May 1939, W.D. Sutton, DWM 2505 [one slide, K-M001435100], (Fig. 2E). Notes. The slide in the Mitchell collection is from one of the specimens mentioned by Raub et al. (1979: 120) in “Collections examined” and the date and locality coincide with the type. These authors also mention that the holotype is deposited in NY00834206 along with several isotypes (NY00834207, NY00834208) and paratypes (NY00834210, NY00834212, NY00834214, NY00834215, NY00834216, NY00834209, NY00834211, NY00834213). Paratypes also were sent to BPI 743773, BPI 743971, K, and the collection of H.W. Keller. We did not find the material in Kew database. * Badhamia verrucospora G. Moreno, D.W. Mitch. & Novozh., Bol. Soc. Micol. Madrid 35:98 (2011) Notes. According to Moreno et al. (2011: 101), the holotype collected by Mitchell is from “ USA: Arizona, 40 km E of Flagstaff, on herbivore dung in moist chamber, 27-V-2000, leg. D.W. Mitchell, DWM 6071 holotype, AH 39265 isotype ”. However, in the Mitchell collection we did not find this material so it must only be conserved in AH. There was another specimen (DWM 7870) from New Mexico, Monastery Road, elk dung, wet 31/7/12, harvested 11 Sept. 2012 but it is not type material.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".