MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6892886310 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.12783618

PREDICTING CHURN IN TELECOM SECTOR USING A POPULATION-BASED INCREMENTAL ANN LEARNING ALGORITHM

2024· article· en· W6892886310 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCustomer churn and segmentation
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChurningArtificial neural networkCustomer retentionProfit (economics)Customer satisfactionProbabilistic logicInefficiencyCustomer intelligenceSimulated annealing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract With global advancement, Information Technology has led to the growth of numerous Service Providers, which, in turn, has resulted in fierce competition between themselves. For Service Providers, the most prevalent obstacle is the handling of customer churn, retention, and satisfaction of customers for successful market sustenance. Customer Relationship Management (CRM) concentrates on boosting, sustaining, and building long term customer associations. CRM relies on the collection of information prior to making decisions. When a customer halts the existing service provider relationship and shifts to another, this is referred to as churn. The overall business profit and image are perturbed by this never-ending motion of churning. Therefore, it is more preferable to stop customers from churning and going for forecasting. In this work, churn prediction in telecom sector is investigated. Artificial Neural Network are used for prediction. To enhance the performance of the ANN, it is required to optimize its structure. From a given solution set, the global optimum can be detected utilizing the probabilistic method of Simulated Annealing (SA). Various optimization problems related to engineering and other areas have been resolved favourably with Population-Based Incremental Learning (PBIL) utilization. For predicting customer churn, this work has proposed a structure optimized Hybrid Simulated Annealing – Population-Based Incremental Learning ANN. Further deep learning techniques were used to improve the Churn prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicCustomer churn and segmentationFrench-language works237,207