MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6892899268 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13274545

Orthonevra roseae Miranda & Thompson 2024, sp. nov.

2024· article· en· W6892899268 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIchthyology and Marine Biology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScapeDorsumWhite (mutation)Compound eyeGalea

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orthonevra roseae Miranda & Thompson sp. nov. 98-2. Thompson 2006: 22 (key reference) Figs 32 and 33. Map: Fig. 39 Diagnosis. The posteriorly fused vittae on the scutum will distinguish this species from most Orthonevra, and the eye pattern and pale metabasitarsomere will tell it apart from O. theta. Description. MALE. Head (Fig. 32d–f): metallic bluish-black, face with convexity in profile and ventral 1/4 slightly produced anteriorly as a convexity, strongly regulose except smooth on ventral 1/3, shiny, pile white and not scale-like; with white microtrichose subtriangular macula laterally, positioned immediately ventral to antennal base and separated from it. Antenna brown without metallic reflections, scape paler; pedicel twice the length of the scape, postpedicel oval elongated, as long as the pedicel; pile black. Mala slightly produced apico-ventrally, smooth. Gena shiny, smooth, and with white pile. Frontal triangle regulose, bare except for lateral row of white pile adjacent to eye margin. Vertical triangle isosceles triangle-shaped, 4 × longer than eye contiguity, dark matte to slightly green metallic, bare; ocellar triangle with a coarse texture, bare. Occiput not visible laterally on dorsal 1/3, ventral 2/3 covered in white microtrichia which extends until dorsal to gena, with one row of very short black pile, pile becomes slightly longer and white on ventral 1/4. Eyes holoptic; with a sub-anterior and middle sinuous vittae, and a medial fascia distinct until the middle vitta then inconspicuous posterior to that vitta, eyes darker on anterior margin, with dark area wider dorsally and connecting the ends to the sub-anterior vitta, and dark on ventral half of the posterior margin. Thorax (Fig. 32d, e): mostly metallic green, pile white, very short, appressed and sparsely distributed, slightly longer on notopleuron; scutum with four complete, uninterrupted and non-tapering dark matte vittae, medial pair fused on posterior 1/4, and a shorter lateral vittate macula posterior to the transverse sulcus; notopleuron metallic green, remaining of scutum covered by microsculpture; scutellum matte black on basal 2/3, except greenish on base, and bluish on apex, pile inconspicuous. Pleuron wholly metallic blue, smooth on proepimeron and anterior on anepisternum, remaining with a coarse texture, with densely distributed white microtrichia on proepisternum, with long white pile on antepronotum, ventral patch on katepisternum, dorsal to the posterior spiracle on the katatergum, and metasternum, with short pile on proepimeron, posterior anepisternum, dorsal patch on katepisternum, and anterior anepimeron, and very short on proepisternum. Dorsal lobe of calypter white with long white marginal pile, ventral lobe similar but pile 3 × longer than dorsal pile. Plumule white. Halter yellowish. Legs (Fig. 32e): mostly metallic bluish-black, except apex of femora, basal 1/3 of tibiae and all tarsomeres 1–2 yellow, all tarsomeres 3–5 dark; pro and metabasitarsomere swollen. Legs covered with short white pile, apex of mesotibia and mesotarsomeres with ventral black setulae, metafemur with ventral surface covered in black setulae. Wing (Fig. 32d): with vittae sub-apically (from end of R2+3 until posterior end of M1), sub-apically on r1, and on dm-m, and with fasciate maculae in r2+3, r4+5 (two), and dm, wing apex diffusely darker (Fig. 32d), stem vein and vein C paler until crossvein h, mostly microtrichose, bare on small basal area of cell cua, immediately posterior to pseudovein; basicosta with dense appressed black pile, with two more prominent setae apically. Alula 2 × the width of cell c. Abdomen (Fig. 32e): metallic bluish-black, terga matte black in large medial rectangular area, terminalia wholly metallic, pile sockets as small protuberances, pile black, appressed and very short, white laterally, longer laterally on tergum 1, much longer baso-laterally on tergum 2; sterna metallic, with white pile; sternum 4 slightly projected on right side. Genitalia (Fig. 33c–f): epandrium bilobate dorso-anteriorly (Fig. 33e); surstyli crescent-shaped, curving towards each other, expanded as two short protuberances dorso-basally, and apex bent laterally, with pile restricted to dorsal margin ventral to expanded lobes and on apical 1/2 (Fig. 33e, f); cercus hook-shaped. Hypandrium sub-rectangular and short, with short V-shaped notch apico-ventrally that bears two laminae on each side, basal lamina short and triangular and more medially positioned, apical lamina irregular, large, more laterally positioned, and following almost to the apex of the postgonites (Fig. 33d), with very short and sparse pile on apico-lateral surface and also with some pile baso-laterally on apical lamina; postgonite rectangular, short, slightly bent dorsally, pilose on dorsal, apical and lateral surfaces; phallus short, with hooked apex, a pair of short acute projections followed by a blunt short projection medio-ventrally, basal tubular process short, as long as the other processes, concavities between processes shallow (Fig. 33d). Variation. Ocellar triangle sometimes with a few inconspicuous white pile. Eye dark anterior margin might not be visible. Scutum vittae may have purple reflections. Pleuron might be smooth ventrally on katepisternum. Metatibia sometimes with only basal 1/4 yellow. FEMALE (Figs 32a–c, 33a, b). Like male except: face microtrichose patch smaller and more distanced from antennal base; pedicel slightly shorter than postpedicel; frons wide, strongly regulose, with a medial longitudinal groove extending from ocellar triangle almost until lunule, pile white and sparse; vertex might have only short black pile posterior to ocellar triangle; ocellar triangle might have bluish reflections; tergum 5 as a trapezoidal wholly shiny sclerite. Genitalia (Fig. 33a, b): tergum and sternum 7 as sclerotized rectangular areas. Tergum 8 as a sclerotized rectangular plate with concave posterior margin, bare. Sternum 8 as a sclerotized plate, slightly longer than wide, large (over 3 × the size of tergum 8), and with a V-shaped notch apically, sparsely pilose but mostly bare on apico-lateral areas. Epiproct as a semi-circular plate, pilose on apical 1/2, baso-lateral corners slightly produced (possible apodemes). Cercus oval, baso-lateral corner slightly extended, mostly pilose, positioned apically to epiproct. Hypoproct mostly membranous, with a triangular (one vertex directed basally) pigmented and pilose area. Length. Body 5.10–5.47mm (n=5), wing 4.12–4.40mm (n=5); female 5.80–5.86mm (n=2), wing 4.90–5.16mm (n=2). Distribution. Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela (Fig. 39). Altitudinal range. 1100–2560m. Etymology. The name is a matronymic derived from GFGM’s mother, based on her nickname (Rose, a modern personal name). It should be treated as a noun in the genitive case. Comments. Orthonevra roseae sp. nov. has the middle vittae of the scutum fused posteriorly, in a similar fashion as on O. theta sp. nov., but O. roseae sp. nov. has different eye patterns and its metabasitarsomere is wholly pale. Type material examined: PERU. Cuzco, Paucartambo, Puente San Pedro, 50 km west of, 1600 m, Pilcopota [12°54'57.7"S 71°23'54.7"W], 3.ix.1988, W. N. Mathis & A. Friedberg (male holotype roseae USNM, USNMENT 01492590). Paratypes examined: COLOMBIA. Antioquia, El Retiro [ca 6°03'42.2"N 75°29'44.9"W], 7 km north of, 26.ii.1984, W. N. Mathis (1 female USNM, USNMENT01492600); …, Envigado, Vereda El Vallano, Parque Ecológico El Salado, Quebrada La Ayurá, 6.135160 -75.569556, 1600 m, Jama en Bosque, 13.ix.2009, A.L. Montoya G, (photo, 1 female, CEUA46625); Girardota, Vereda La Honda, 6.338694 -75.448333, Jama Bosque secundario, 26–30.ix.2009, N. Uribe (photo, 1 male, CEUA46626). ECUADOR. Zamora-Chinchipe, Loja, Zamora [ca 4°03'34.1"S 78°57'01.0"W], 1200 m, 25.xi.1970, L.E. Peña (1 male MZUSP); ..., 1800 m, 26.xi.1970, L.E. Peña (1 female MZUSP). PERU. Cuzco, Paucartambo, Puente San Pedro, 50 km west of, 1600 m, Pilcopota [12°54'57.7"S 71°23'54.7"W], 3.ix.1988, W. N. Mathis & A. Friedberg (8 males USNM, USNMENT01492591– 598). VENEZUELA. Aragua, Rancho Grande [10°21'07.2"N 67°41'00.9"W], 1100 m, 21.vii.1990, D. G. Furth (1 male USNM, USNMENT01492599).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicIchthyology and Marine Biology→French-language works237,207→