MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6892902907 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13158971

Quakers in Barbados, 1655-1780

2024· article· en· W6892902907 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReligion, Gender, and Enlightenment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFellGeorge (robot)ChristianityCompassionGovernment (linguistics)New englandInclusion (mineral)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quakerism began in England circa 1650 when founder George Fox had a vision. He saw a need for a Christianity which embraced equality, honesty, compassion for the needy, non-violence, and that would embrace what what he termed an "inner light" or "the Christ within." The movement quickly gained popularity, but Fox and his followers were heavily persecuted. They fell afoul of the authorities for their refusal to pay taxes or tithes and refusal to engage in violence, including joining the military, among other issues. As well as following a desire to spread their views, Quakers also were sometimes transported from England to the Americas. Quakers were relatively early arrivals to the British Caribbean (Barbados and Jamaica), but made themselves unpopular due to their egaliterian ideas in bringing bondspeople into their meetings. Although originally slaveholders themelves, they eventially outlawed slaveholding among their congregants. In Barbados official Acts were passed in 1676 and 1678 outlawing the inclusion of bondspeople in Quaker meetings, as the practice was seen as a threat to stability on the island and an encouragement to rebellion. At their most popular point in Barbados, there were six meeting houses and a significant number of members. As the eighteenth century wore on, numbers diminished to almost zero. George Fox has often been considered of great importance in the struggle for abolition. The first Quakers arrived on Barbados in 1655, and by 1700 the island boasted six meeting houses. In 1676 and 1678 the government of Barbados passed Acts to prevent Quakers from bringing bondspeople to their meetings, partly as a response to a slave uprising in 1675. Although the group's presence in Barbados had expanded quickly, they dwindled in numbers to become almost non-existent on the island by the mid-eighteenth century. During a hurricane in 1780 all six meeting houses were destroyed and never rebuilt. Because of the Quakers' movement from slaveholders to antislavery inspiration, and their changing presence in the British Caribbean, they hold an important place in Barbadian history. Quakerism, in its modern form, varies somewhat from its early aspect in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; therefore, answers are given based on what is known about the group during the time period given and within Barbados.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicReligion, Gender, and EnlightenmentFrench-language works237,207