Cooperative Function of Two Active Ears via Interaural Coupling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The left and right ears of some non-mammals can act as a “pressure-gradient receiver” to improve directional sensitivity by virtue of acoustic coupling of the tympanic membranes via the interaural canal (IAC). A seminal study by Roongthumskul et al. (2019) extended this to show that the two active inner ears of a gecko can also effectively synchronize (i.e., each adjusts their self-oscillation frequencies due to coupling). This result is significant because it suggests that the two ears can expend energy to influence one another, with myriad implications for auditory function (e.g., low sound level localization). A subsequent study examining Anolis lizards showed that spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAE) are readily measurable in the IAC using an orally placed probe (Bergevin et al., 2020). Further, acoustic modeling of the IAC using known morphology showed that the motion of one eardrum, presumably driven by the ipsilateral inner ear, was sufficient to drive the contralateral eardrum and thereby couple the two (inner) ears. We expand upon those studies by reporting simultaneous SOAE measurements made externally at the left and right meatuses from six anoles. Several general features were considered, including overlap of SOAE spectral magnitudes across ears and vector strength determined from the phase. Half the experiments showed clear magnitude overlap from both ears above 1.5 − 2 kHz but less of a match below. The other lizards exhibited SOAE activity that was not as well-matched between ears. Similar to that reported for geckos, vector strength was often observed to be elevated in regions of overlapping SOAE activity, including about the “valleys” between peaks. Further, vector strengths could show larger maximum values for anole compared to gecko. Individual SOAE peaks were also filtered to extract amplitude (AM) and frequency modulations (FM), from which we performed fluctuation correlation analyses. We found that ipsilateral pairs (i.e., peaks at different frequencies measured from one ear) could show weak AM correlations (usually for nearest neighbors), but no FM correlations were present. However, relatively much stronger AM and FM correlations could be observed for peaks at similar frequencies measured simultaneously across ears – even at the valleys between peaks. Further, correlation delays between ears were not constant (i.e., it did not appear that one ear was uniformly driving the other). Additionally, we examined the effect of external sound stimulation to determine a “trans-IAC” transfer function (i.e., from one probe sealed at the external meatus relative to the other). These exhibited attenuation across the spectrum and phase-gradient delays slightly longer than expected, given the probe separation. These measurements suggest additional delay contributions beyond airborne acoustic propagation (e.g., tympanic motions) and that an emission measured ipsilaterally may contain contributions from both ears. In summary, this study bolsters evidence that the two ears of a lizard may act cooperatively by actively synchronizing via the IAC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".