Cognitive Proficiency Evaluation In Haemodialysis Patients: Unveiling Insights With The Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) can indeed have various effects on cognitive function, potentially leading to cognitive impairment. The impact of cognitive impairment on the quality of life for CKD patients is significant. Cognitive decline can affect daily activities, medication adherence, and the ability to manage one's health effectively.Methodology:204 subjects were included and the MoCA scale was utilized for detailed neurological examinations. In this study one way ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis test were used for statistical analysis.Results:Cognitive decline in CKD patients undergoing hemodialysis is measured using the MoCA scale as an assessment tool. According to our findings, patients with CKD on hemodialysis (HD) are more prone to mild cognitive decline than those with moderate and severe forms.Conclusion:It is clear from the study findings that cognitive decline is more prevalent in CKD patients who undergo hemodialysis. The study identifies several contributing factors to cognitive impairment in these patients, emphasizing the pivotal role of cognitive assessment in the diagnosis of CKD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".