MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893022605 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13255874

BY-COVID D2.3 Enabling data discovery at source using beacon-like mechanisms

2024· article· en· W6893022605 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsDeliverableInteroperabilityData discoveryBeaconBig dataImplementationData sharingNeighbor Discovery ProtocolOpen research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deliverable D2.3, titled "Enabling data discovery at source using beacon-like mechanisms," presents the outcomes and advancements achieved by Work Package 2 (WP2) partners within the BY-COVID project. The report delineates existing data discovery mechanisms and introduces novel cross-domain data discovery through extensions to the Beacon and the Beacon Network technologies, particularly focusing on its application to COVID-19 data. Throughout the duration of the project, significant progress has been made in expanding standard data discovery mechanisms. Collaborative efforts have resulted in the enhancement of Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) Beacon-based mechanisms, enabling efficient data discovery at its source. This deliverable describes eight different Beacon implementations from BY-COVID partners, and other institutions in Europe and other parts of the world (Canada and Australia). These beacons share cross-domain data, from viral genomes and epidemiology to rich patient information or combined viral and host genomes from the same donors. The achievements prove the commitment to enabling data discovery at its source. By extending Beacon technologies, the project has paved the way for enhanced data accessibility and interoperability across various research domains. Nevertheless, the deliverable shows that the use of popular models and dictionaries (like OMOP or ISARIC eCRF) is not enough to achieve solid interoperability, although it enormously reduces the harmonisation gap and opens the door to generation of tools to bridge these gaps. These advancements signify a crucial step forward in empowering researchers to efficiently access and use diverse datasets, ultimately contributing to more informed decision-making and research outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.049
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.049
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0120.013
Open science0.0060.020
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.046

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesFrench-language works237,207