MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6893072071 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.12783839

Lytvolasma Soshkina 1925

2023· article· en· W6893072071 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenusType speciesSynonym (taxonomy)Type (biology)Permian

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genus Lytvolasma Soshkina, 1925. Type species: Lytvolasma asymetrica Soshkina, 1925 [sic!]. Diagnosis: Non dissepimented small solitary corals; cardinal fossula deep, key-hole shaped, often bordered by half aulos in counter quadrants; cardinal septum shortened late in ontogeny; counter septum slightly elongated; major septa semi-radial in arrangement; minor septa very short; microstructure of septa trabecular (Fedorowski, 1987a). Remarks: Lytvolasma is a complex genus with unclear relations to several other taxa, as extensively discussed by Fedorowski (1987a). He modified the diagnosis by Hill (1981) who questioned the validity of Lytvolasma and considered it as a possible junior synonym of Bradyphyllum Grabau, 1928. However, due to morphological differences Fedorowski (1987a) considered both genera as valid and did not include the presence of long, slightly curved, thickened septa that are laterally contiguous over much of their length and almost reach the axis from Hill’s diagnosis. However, opposed to Fedorowksi, these characteristics were confirmed by Chwieduk (2013, tab. 3). According to Fedorowski (1987a), intimate relations of the genus exist with further Antiphyllinae, as Lytvolasma specimens were attributed by authors in part to Actinophrentis Ivanovski, 1967, as well as to species of Allotropiophyllum Grabau, 1928 and Bradyphyllum. In addition, the type species of the hapsiphyllinid Parasterophrentis, P. virgata Fomichev, 1953 has to be transferred to Lytvolasma. Opposed, Lytvolasma (?) cf. L. geinitzi (Toula, 1875) described by Flügel (1973) from the Upper Permian of eastern Greenland was included in Tachylasma rhizoides Soshkina, 1925 by Fedorowski (1982). He also excluded Lytvolasma from Northeast China figured by Guo (1980), but opposed, Fedorowski and Bamber (2001) did not rule out the possibility that some of Guo’s specimens might be included. Lytvolasma described from Tibet (Wang and Liu, 1982; Wu, 1975) and Xingjiang (Wang and Yu, 1986) were included in Euryphyllum (Fedorowski, 1982). Similarities to further genera were extensively discussed by Fedorowksi (1987a). According to the author, Lytvolasma Soshkina, 1925 shows some similarities to Allotropiophyllum Grabau, 1928. It is distinguished from the latter by the elongation of counter septum and the alar septa in the early growth stage, a slightly but permanently elongated counter septum at maturity, shortening of the cardinal septum late in ontogeny, and the calice floor deeper in the cardinal quadrants. Based on the holotype of the type species of Allotropiochisma Fedorowski, 1982, Allotropiochisma longiseptata (Flügel, 1973), this genus is sufficiently different from Lytvolasma in having a narrow cardinal fossula, lacking an elongated counter septum, "biform reduction" of minor septa, and biform peripheral–most tabularium. In addition, Euryphyllum Hill, 1938 is similar. In fact, Lytvolasma sp. No. 2 described from the Lower Permian of the Northern Urals (Dobrolyubova, 1936) and at least some specimens described as Lytvolasma by Wu (1975) and Lin (1983) from the Lower Permian of Tibet might belong to that genus, as well as some specimens described by Guo (1980) from Northeast China (Fedorowski and Bamber, 2001). Geographic and stratigraphic range: Lytvolasma is a spatiotemporally widespread genus. It is known from the Bashkirian of the Donets Basin and the Southern Urals/ Bashkirian Mountains (Kossovaya, 1986), but was not listed from the Bashkirian of the Donets Basin by Fedorowski (2022). According to Fedorowski (1987a), it occurs there from Kasimovian to Gzhelian (C 2 3 –C 3 3). The genus is known from the Kasimovian of Egypt (Kora and Mansour, 1991 and this paper) and Donets Basin, from the Pennsylvanian–Permian transition of the Glass Mountains, western Texas (Uddenites -bearing shale member of Gaptank Formation, Fedorowski, 1987a), from the upper Artinskian and lowermost Kungirian (lower Saranian) of the Central Urals (Kossovaya et al., 2001; Kossovaya, 2007, Fig. 6; Shoshkina, 1925), the Sakmarian of Spitsbergen (Chwieduk, 2013) and from the Wordian (Middle Guadalupian) of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (Fedorowski and Bamber, 2001). The existence of Lytvolasma in Tibet (Wu, 1975) was rejected by Fedorowski (1987a), but Fang and Fan (1994; not seen) again reported a “ Lytvolasma fauna” in SW Yunnan (Baoshan–Pengchong). To us, the presence of Lytvolasma in Tibet and the Baoshan Block, southwestern Yunnan, i.e., in terranes originally bordering the northern margin of Gondwana, remains unsure and needs revaluation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils→French-language works237,207→