Aphanerostethus darlingi Lewis 2024, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aphanerostethus darlingi Lewis sp. nov. Figs 9 E, F, 16 A, B Specimens examined. Holotype: Malaysia: Borneo: Sarawak: • Gunung Mulu National Park, 1387 m, Camp 3, 4°2.284'N, 114°53.36'E, 27. XI. 2009 – 12. I. 2010, malaise trap, D. C. Darling, B. Hubley, deposited in SFDK, ROM_OSU 308049, JHLHY_DAR_126. Paratype: Malaysia: Borneo: Sarawak: • Gunung Mulu National Park, 1387 m, Camp 3, 4°2.284'N, 114°53.36'E, 24. VII – 21. IX. 2011, malaise trap, D. C. Darling, (1, CMNC), ROM_OSU 308460, JHLHY_DAR_125. Diagnosis. Body length 2.0 mm. Cuticle coated in crusty dark, sandy gray, and white scales in weakly defined pattern. Funicle with six articles. Procoxae contiguous. Only odd-numbered elytral intervals with erect scales. Erect elytral scales evenly distributed, not concentrated in bundle. Scutellum not distinct. Femora each with prominent tooth. Prosternal cavity prominent and with steep lateral ridges. Metaventrite with small tubercle between meta- and mesocoxae, not a distinct transverse ridge. Distribution. This species is currently only known from Gunung Mulu National Park, Borneo, Malaysia. Etymology. The specific name darlingi honors the collector of the type series, Christopher Darling (Royal Ontario Museum), for his contributions to entomology in southeast Asia. It is a genitive, invariable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".