Cubitermes oculatus Josens & Deligne 2019
Bibliographic record
Abstract
6. The oculatus valve pattern group The workers within this pattern have basic enteric valves (Fig. 17A): all six primary cushions are similar in their arrangement but not in their sizes. The primary cushions are roughly triangular: their largest width is generally located near their upstream end and their lateral margins converge gradually downstream until the bristly part, where they remain parallel (Fig. 11B). The enteric valve shows bilateral symmetry, PC1 being much longer and often wider than the other PCs (WVP1-Pre> 1.30) (Fig. 17A). PC1 is made of (a) an upstream spiny part (40–66% of total length) with relatively strong spines, (b) a middle spiny part (10–27% of total length) with somewhat weaker spines and generally with 5–8 lateral supporting bristles on each side, and (c) a bristly part (22–38% of total length) with 30–50 straight, curved and eventually hooked bristles (Fig. 11B). The secondary cushions, near their upstream end, are never wider than the primary cushions; however, in some cases, they widen in their downstream, bristly, fuzzy parts (Figs 4G, 17A). The secondary cushions SC12 and SC61 (on both sides of PC1) are often faint or may be totally lacking (Fig. 17A). In the soldier’s enteric valve, the primary cushions are well outlined except at their upstream end; PC1 is much longer than the other primary cushions (SVP1-Pre> 1.25) and often substantially widened between the first upstream quarter and the middle (Fig. 17B). The secondary cushions are like those of workers but bear less developed spines. This basic valve pattern is characterised by a long PC1 and therefore by high bilateral symmetry and PC1 pre-eminence indices in both soldiers and workers, and by the high elongation index of the workers’ SCs (Table 5); most species are small. Material examined Two species have such enteric valves:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".