MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6893103918 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14728750

CFIA-NCFAD/nf-flu: 3.7.0

2025· other· en· W6893103918 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of CanadaCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCleavage (geology)SubtypingRowTable (database)GenBank

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This minor release adds GenoFLU for H5 genotyping and HA cleavage site output with VADR annotations. This release also adds a script to classify HA cleavage sites based on mono-/multibasicity and low/high pathogenicity. Changes feat: GenoFLU v1.05 for H5 genotyping. feat: Added --custom_flu_minfo option to specify custom flu.minfo for VADR. The default flu.minfo is the same as the VADR flu v1.6.3-2 model except that it includes cleavage site info. Feature table, GenBank and GFF files should now have a misc_feature for HA cleavage site info. feat: bin/cleavage_site.py to classify HA cleavage sites. feat: Added VADR subtype prediction into subtyping report. VADR subtype predictions are pulled from the output .mdl files. feat: Added subtyping report output directory containing CSV for each sheet in the Excel report. fix: MultiQC converts the general info table into a violin plot if there are more than 500 rows in the table by default. Added max_table_rows: 1000000 to multiqc_config.yaml to avoid this conversion in most cases. What's Changed Add GenoFLU and HA cleavage site prediction by @cerdelyan in https://github.com/CFIA-NCFAD/nf-flu/pull/103 Release 3.7.0 by @peterk87 in https://github.com/CFIA-NCFAD/nf-flu/pull/104 New Contributors @cerdelyan made their first contribution in https://github.com/CFIA-NCFAD/nf-flu/pull/103 Full Changelog: https://github.com/CFIA-NCFAD/nf-flu/compare/3.6.2...3.7.0

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2260.373

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→French-language works237,207→