MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893113003 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14981347

Sclerocoelus synorios Kuwahara, Marshall & Paiero, 2025, sp. nov.

2025· article· en· W6893113003 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicTardigrade Biology and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeEtymologyMeristicsMalaise

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sclerocoelus synorios sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 86808438-F122-4007-9C83-FF8343EBB199 Figs 9D, 133–135 Etymology This name reflects the distribution of this species, which spans the border between Mexico and the United States (from the Greek ‘ sýnoro ’, meaning ‘border, boundary, limit’). Material examined Holotype MEXICO • ♂; Baja California Sur, Sierra Laguna, La Laguna, 31.5 km ENE of Todos Santos; 1800 m a.s.l.; 12–18 Dec. 1979; C.E. Griswold leg.; CAS. Paratypes MEXICO – Baja California Sur • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; CAS. – Chiapas • 2 ♂♂; 5 km NE of Coapilla; 17°10′34″ N, 93°07′59″ W; 1990 m a.s.l.; 25 May–14 Jun. 2008; 2° mesophyll forest, Malaise trap; DEBU • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; UVGC. – Mexico • 1 ♀; 1.6 km E of Ixtapan de la Sal, km 78; 1900 m a.s.l.; 31 Aug.–6 Sep. 1971; A. Newton leg.; “Trop/Dec/Jun.”, human dung; FMNH. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA – Arizona • 1 ♂; Flagstaff, Oak Creek Canyon, at Sterling Canyon; 1800 m a.s.l.; 17–25 Jul. 1979; S. and J. Peck leg.; riparian woods, Malaise trap; DEBU. Description BODY (Fig. 133A). Length 2.3–3.6 mm. Head dark brown, lower fifth of frons orange, orange area extending along orbital plate; gena reddish. Frontal width 2.2–2.3× frontal height. Three pairs of strong interfrontal bristles surmounting a very fine fourth pair; anterior orbital 0.6–0.7 × length of posterior. Palpus orange. Eye large, greatest height about 3.5× shortest genal height. Thorax dark brown, scutum with paler lateral edges. Two pairs of dorsocentral bristles (anterior pair distinct, 0.4× length of posterior pair) separated by 6–7 rows of acrostichal setulae. Membrane around prosternum bare. Legs dark brown, tarsomeres paler. Fore femur with three large ventral preapical setae. Ventral surface of male mid tibia with two rows of stout setae in apical quarter. Wing (Fig. 9D) slightly infuscate. CS2 0.8–0.9 × CS3. Halter brown. MALE ABDOMEN (Figs 133B–C, 134). Dark brown, posterior edges of tergites sometimes slightly desclerotized. T2–5 and S2–4 uniformly long-setose with large posterolateral setae. S5 rectangular, 2.0× as long as wide, sparsely setose, anterior half with two narrow, converging pale stripes, posteromedially with a large, dark, slightly bulging patch of dense setulae flanked by pale areas and dark, setose patches. Anterior flange of S6+7 very large, 1.1 × as long as wide. Sclerite A small, dark; sclerite B large, broad, arched; sclerite C absent; sclerite D short, broad, club-shaped, arising from left side of posteromedial process of S5; sclerite E elongate, sinuate, slightly folded over itself; sclerite F large, rectangular with an elongate, deflexed, apicoventral process on left side; sclerite G elongate, curved; ring sclerite dark, small. Epandrium moderate, 0.7× length of S8, height 1.1 × maximum length and 0.7 × maximum width, uniformly setose, posterior setae larger, posteroventral corner slightly emarginate; anal fissure broadly triangular; perianal pads strongly protruding, elongate, dark, curved, dorsally setulose, ventrally setose. Pseudocercus large, separate from epandrium, bearing three strong setae; halves of subepandrial sclerite narrow, strongly arched, and fused medially. Subcercus with a short inner part, articulating with subepandrial sclerite dorsally, forming a small, posteriorly bent process ventrally, and an outer part with short lobes articulating with surstylus and subcercus. Hypandrium with narrow, sinuate anteromedial apodeme. Surstylus subquadrate, slightly elongate, laterally setulose, ventrally setose, inner surface with a large carinate lobe extending from near middle to anterodorsal corner. Postgonite flattened, curved anteriorly, apex slightly expanded, pale, and striate. Phallapodeme large, apex dorsoventrally flattened; basiphallus strongly dorsoventrally flattened basally, apically notched, and distally expanded, extending along dorsal margin of distiphallus; distiphallus short, with a pale, broad, sheath-like ventral sclerite and a pair of dark, narrow dorsolateral sclerites. FEMALE ABDOMEN (Fig. 135). T7 broad, simple; T8 divided into a small, pale, dorsal sclerite and two large, dark, lateral sclerites, posterolateral corners expanded posteriorly. Epiproct broad, medially desclerotized (especially posteromedially), and entirely setulose. Cercus elongate, apically pointed with long apical and dorsal setae. S7 broad, posteromedially pointed with 4–5 large posterior setae; S8 reduced to a thin, curved sclerite with dark lateral edges. Three spermathecae, bulb stout, bean-shaped, finely striate with a deep, broad invagination on thicker end, invagination with a finger-like, central process. Distribution Nearctic: United States of America; Neotropical: Mexico. Remarks Sclerocoelus synorios sp. nov. is superficially similar to S. recurvatus sp. nov. but differs by the asymmetrical (strongly reduced on the right side) male S5 with a stout posteromedial setulose patch, elongate surstylus, strongly reduced female S8, and relatively stout hypoproct. Sclerocoelus synorios is a mostly Mexican species also known from a single record just across the border into Arizona, making it one of three Sclerocoelus species known from the United States. It is one of eight congeners found in Mexico, two of which are known only from Mexico. One of the apparent Mexican endemics (S. rostrum sp. nov.) is in the S. dasysternum group along with S. synorios sp. nov.; the other endemic (S. pararegularis sp. nov.) is in the S. regularis group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.451
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicTardigrade Biology and EcologyFrench-language works237,207