Endophloeus gorskii Alekseev et Bukejs 2016
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Endophloeus gorskii Alekseev et Bukejs, 2016 (Figs 30–32) Material examined. One specimen with collection number JDC-9315 [JDC], Baltic amber; adult, sex unknown (Figs 30–31). A complete beetle is included in a transparent, yellow amber piece with dimensions of 20× 17 mm and a maximum thickness of 5 mm, preserved without supplementary fixation. Syninclusions: numerous minute detrital particles. One specimen with collection number ABAC 063 [ACAB] (No. JDC-6438 ex. coll. Jonas Damzen), Baltic amber; adult, male (Fig. 32). A complete beetle with partially exposed metathoracic wings and apical portion of aedeagus is included in a transparent, yellow amber piece with dimensions of 14× 10 mm and a maximum thickness of 5 mm, preserved without supplementary fixation. Ventral portion of specimen is completely obscured by ‘milky’ opacity within amber. Syninclusions: absent. Note. Body length of beetle JDC-9315 (including visible part of head) 3.3 mm. Body length of beetle ABAC 063 (including visible part of head) 3.5 mm. Even though the specimens are larger than the holotype, no morphological or significant differences were found, and the specimens are assigned to extinct E. gorskii.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".