MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893125577 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14091205

PM_116086_B_Sint_Maria_Horebeke

2019· other· nl· W6893125577 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typeother
Languagenl
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulpitQuarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)

Abstract

File Name: PM_116086_B_Sint_Maria_Horebeke.jpg Sublocation: Sint-Maria-Horebeke, parochiekerk Onze-Lieve-Vrouw-Hemelvaart Location: Horebeke Province: Oost-Vlaanderen Country: Belgium Header: Interieur, eiken kansel met grisailleschilderingen uit eind 18de of begin 19de eeuw, hersteld en geschilderd door J; Bevernaege (Gent) in 1908 Description: Parish church (Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Hemelvaartkerk) Interior The pulpit Keywords: Belgium, Classicism, Cultural heritage, Europe, Horebeke, Monuments, Oost-Vlaanderen, Sint-Maria-Horebeke (Horebeke), Styles, Vlaamse Ardennen, Vlaanderen streken Author: Photo: Paul M.R. Maeyaert Copyright: Paul M.R. Maeyaert

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

How this classification was reachedexpand

The three-model screen

all 5,600 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: about_only · design weight: 3321.24 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: other
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Deposited heritage photograph of a Belgian parish church interior; not research.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: other
about Canada: no
confidence: high

It is a cultural heritage photograph record, not research itself.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: other
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Heritage photograph metadata for a Belgian church pulpit; not scholarly research.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9140.888

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)French-language works237,207