MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893128792 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15357489

Dolichogenidea arenal Fernandez-Triana & Boudreault 2025, sp. nov.

2025· article· en· W6893128792 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphParks Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvipositorMargin (machine learning)WingType (biology)DNA barcoding

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dolichogenidea arenal Fernandez-Triana & Boudreault sp. nov. Fig. 30 A – F Type material. Holotype. Costa Rica • Female, CNC; Alajuela, Arenal Volcano, northern slope; 550 m; 26–27.ix.1972; J. Helava leg.; Voucher code: CNC 1179955. Diagnostic description. Fore wing veins r and 2 RS meeting at a strong angle; T 1 mostly parallel-sided but narrowing towards posterior margin near its posterior half, its length medially ~ 3.0 × its width at posterior margin and its width at anterior margin 1.4 × its width at posterior margin; T 2 length medially 3.0 × its width at posterior margin; ovipositor sheath 0.75 × as long as metatibia; pterostigma uniformly colored, mostly brown to pale brown; pro- and mesocoxae yellow-white, metacoxa mostly yellow with small brown spot on anterior 0.2; metafemur and metatibia mostly yellow or yellow-white, with brown spot on posterior 0.3 and 0.1 respectively; body length: 2.63 mm; fore wing length: 2.72 mm. Among species with T 2 not strongly sculptured, D. arenal is distinctive based on strong angulation of fore wing veins r and 2 RS, as well as leg color, shape of T 1 and T 2, ovipositor sheath lengths, and body size. Distribution. Costa Rica. Biology. No host data available. DNA barcoding data. No data. Etymology. Named after the type locality, the Arenal Volcan, in Costa Rica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBotany and Geology in Latin America and CaribbeanFrench-language works237,207