Bibliographic record
Abstract
PALAEONEURA Waterhouse, 1915 (Figs 236–246) Palaeoneura Waterhouse, 1915: 537. Type species: Palaeoneura interrupta Waterhouse, 1919, by subsequent designation by Gahan & Fagan, 1923: 103. See Huber et al. (2020) for generic synonyms and their type species. Diagnosis. Face without subantennal sulcus ventral to each torulus and without a small pit medially next to each torulus (Fig. 240); toruli separated by at least their own height from transverse trabecula; propleura narrowly abutting each other anterior to prosternum (Figs 241, 243); fore wing slight to distinct narrowing beyond apex of venation, the posterior margin of wing thus slightly to distinctly lobed (Fig. 239); petiole attached posteriorly to gs 1 (Fig. 237). Remarks. Palaeoneura belongs to the Polynema group of genera. Palaeoneura is identified first by elimination from most of the other genera in the group, then by features used to distinguish it from specimens of two of the three subgenera of Polynema that occur in the Neotropical region. Palaeoneura is distinguished from P. (Polynema) by the propleura abutting medially, sometimes only narrowly, anterior to prosternum whereas in P. (Polynema) the propleura are separate from each other anteriorly. Palaeoneura is distinguished from Polynema (Doriclytus Foerster) in not having pits between the toruli whereas P. (Doriclytus) has pits between the toruli. Palaeoneura is distinguished from Polynema (Dorypolynema Hayat & Anis) by the ovipositor not exserted beyond the apex of the gaster. Neotropical hosts. Hemiptera: Cicadellidae. Important references. Triapitsyn & Aquino (2010), Triapitsyn (2018).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".