MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893156094 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15034949

الهدية ووظائف التبادل لدى المجموعة المعمرية: دراسة إثنوغرافية لفهم الديناميكيات الاجتماعية والثقافية

2024· other· en· W6893156094 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDowryEthnographyTribeQuarter (Canadian coin)Gift givingSet (abstract data type)Social relation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article discusses "gifts, food, and clothing" as essential elements in building social relationships in the city of Tènés. Gifts signify respect and appreciation, contributing to the strengthening of social ties and the building of trust. They are used for indirect communication in sensitive matters and are an important part of special occasions. The study focuses on analyzing gift documents from wedding ceremonies to understand social relationships in the Maamriya community. It aims to analyze the impact of gift exchange on social relationships, understand the cultural changes' impact on society, and analyze the social patterns that govern interactions among individuals. The study relies on an ethnographic approach using observation, interviews, and document analysis. The Maamriya community is a tribe with a shared culture that follows the marriage traditions of "Sidi Màamr Abu Al-Aliya," who set the dowry at a quarter gold dinar to facilitate marriage due to poverty. The study highlights the importance of gifts in enhancing social bonds and cultural belonging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.203
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2030.107

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207