Amphiphala landryana Brown 2024, new species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amphiphala landryana Brown, new species Fig. 5, 15 Diagnosis. Superficially, A. landryana is indistinguishable from its congeners (Fig. 3–6), although the holotype female is slightly larger than many other congeners. The female genitalia of A. landryana (Fig. 15) are most similar to those of A. liatriana (Fig. 12–14), but they can be distinguished from those of the latter by the much larger sublateral sclerites of the recurved median ventral lobe (the lobe best shown in Fig. 14). Description. Head. Vertex and frons whitish yellow; [labial palpus missing]; antennal scape with pale yellow scales, flagellomeres with tan gray scales. Thorax. Notum concolorous with head; tegula slightly darker basally. Under surface pale yellow. Forewing length 6.0 mm (n = 1); forewing ground color white, overlaid with pale yellow and pale tawny scales; median fascia broad, subtriangular, its base occupying medial 0.33 of hind margin, its truncate apex occupying medial 0.12 of costa, blackish brown, with irregular patches of silvery gray near dorsal margin; preapical fascia small, fuscous, with scattered black and rust scales; fringe concolorous with ground color. Underside gray with contrasting pale yellow ochre costal striae in postmedian and subterminal areas. Hindwing mostly whitish with limited pale gray overscaling; fringe pale yellowish gray. Underside pale yellowish gray. Abdomen. Pale yellow dorsally, slightly paler ventrally. Male genitalia unknown. Female genitalia (Fig. 15) as described for genus, except rounded recurved process posterior to ostial plate with two long, slightly curved, sublateral sclerites; ductus bursae densely spiculate. Type. Holotype ♀, Canada, Manitoba, Manitoba Tall Grass Prairie Preserve, Prairie Trail, 289 m, 49.0730, -967740, 18 Jul 2007, MV light, J.-F. Landry & V. Nazari, CNCLEP00040582, USNM slide 154,796 (CNC). Biology and distribution. This species is known only from the holotype collected in prairie habitat in southernmost Manitoba, Canada, in mid-July. Etymology. The specific epithet is a patronym for our lifelong friend Jean-François Landry, the collector of the holotype specimen. It is considered an adjective, and the suffix “-ana” is a traditional ending for tortricid species names.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".