MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893166228 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15188747

Rescaled CIFAR-10 dataset

2025· dataset· en· W6893166228 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersVetenskapsrådet
KeywordsMNIST databaseGaussianScalingScale (ratio)PreprintSet (abstract data type)Image (mathematics)Deep learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Motivation The goal of introducing the Rescaled CIFAR-10 dataset is to provide a dataset that contains scale variations (up to a factor of 4), to evaluate the ability of networks to generalise to scales not present in the training data. The Rescaled CIFAR-10 dataset was introduced in the paper: [1] A. Perzanowski and T. Lindeberg (2025) "Scale generalisation properties of extended scale-covariant and scale-invariant Gaussian derivative networks on image datasets with spatial scaling variations”, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 67(29), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10851-025-01245-x. with a pre-print available at arXiv: [2] Perzanowski and Lindeberg (2024) "Scale generalisation properties of extended scale-covariant and scale-invariant Gaussian derivative networks on image datasets with spatial scaling variations”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11140. Importantly, the Rescaled CIFAR-10 dataset contains substantially more natural textures and patterns than the MNIST Large Scale dataset, introduced in: [3] Y. Jansson and T. Lindeberg (2022) "Scale-invariant scale-channel networks: Deep networks that generalise to previously unseen scales", Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 64(5): 506-536, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10851-022-01082-2 and is therefore significantly more challenging. Access and rights The Rescaled CIFAR-10 dataset is provided on the condition that you provide proper citation for the original CIFAR-10 dataset: [4] Krizhevsky, A. and Hinton, G. (2009). Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. Tech. rep., University of Toronto. and also for this new rescaled version, using the reference [1] above. The data set is made available on request. If you would be interested in trying out this data set, please make a request in the system below, and we will grant you access as soon as possible. The dataset The Rescaled CIFAR-10 dataset is generated by rescaling 32×32 RGB images of animals and vehicles from the original CIFAR-10 dataset [4]. The scale variations are up to a factor of 4. In order to have all test images have the same resolution, mirror extension is used to extend the images to size 64x64. The imresize() function in Matlab was used for the rescaling, with default anti-aliasing turned on, and bicubic interpolation overshoot removed by clipping to the [0, 255] range. The details of how the dataset was created can be found in [1]. There are 10 distinct classes in the dataset: “airplane”, “automobile”, “bird”, “cat”, “deer”, “dog”, “frog”, “horse”, “ship” and “truck”. In the dataset, these are represented by integer labels in the range [0, 9]. The dataset is split into 40 000 training samples, 10 000 validation samples and 10 000 testing samples. The training dataset is generated using the initial 40 000 samples from the original CIFAR-10 training set. The validation dataset, on the other hand, is formed from the final 10 000 image batch of that same training set. For testing, all test datasets are built from the 10 000 images contained in the original CIFAR-10 test set. The h5 files containing the dataset The training dataset file (~5.9 GB) for scale 1, which also contains the corresponding validation and test data for the same scale, is: cifar10_with_scale_variations_tr40000_vl10000_te10000_outsize64-64_scte1p000_scte1p000.h5 Additionally, for the Rescaled CIFAR-10 dataset, there are 9 datasets (~1 GB each) for testing scale generalisation at scales not present in the training set. Each of these datasets is rescaled using a different image scaling factor, 2k/4, with k being integers in the range [-4, 4]: cifar10_with_scale_variations_te10000_outsize64-64_scte0p500.h5 cifar10_with_scale_variations_te10000_outsize64-64_scte0p595.h5 cifar10_with_scale_variations_te10000_outsize64-64_scte0p707.h5 cifar10_with_scale_variations_te10000_outsize64-64_scte0p841.h5 cifar10_with_scale_variations_te10000_outsize64-64_scte1p000.h5 cifar10_with_scale_variations_te10000_outsize64-64_scte1p189.h5 cifar10_with_scale_variations_te10000_outsize64-64_scte1p414.h5 cifar10_with_scale_variations_te10000_outsize64-64_scte1p682.h5 cifar10_with_scale_variations_te10000_outsize64-64_scte2p000.h5 These dataset files were used for the experiments presented in Figures 9, 10, 15, 16, 20 and 24 in [1]. Instructions for loading the data set The datasets are saved in HDF5 format, with the partitions in the respective h5 files named as('/x_train', '/x_val', '/x_test', '/y_train', '/y_test', '/y_val'); which ones exist depends on which data split is used. The training dataset can be loaded in Python as: with h5py.File(`<filename>`, 'r') as f: x_train = np.array( f["/x_train"], dtype=np.float32) x_val = np.array( f["/x_val"], dtype=np.float32) x_test = np.array( f["/x_test"], dtype=np.float32) y_train = np.array( f["/y_train"], dtype=np.int32) y_val = np.array( f["/y_val"], dtype=np.int32) y_test = np.array( f["/y_test"], dtype=np.int32) We also need to permute the data, since Pytorch uses the format [num_samples, channels, width, height], while the data is saved as [num_samples, width, height, channels]: x_train = np.transpose(x_train, (0, 3, 1, 2)) x_val = np.transpose(x_val, (0, 3, 1, 2)) x_test = np.transpose(x_test, (0, 3, 1, 2)) The test datasets can be loaded in Python as: with h5py.File(`<filename>`, 'r') as f: x_test = np.array( f["/x_test"], dtype=np.float32) y_test = np.array( f["/y_test"], dtype=np.int32) The test datasets can be loaded in Matlab as: x_test = h5read(`<filename>`,'/x_test'); y_test = h5read(`<filename>`,'/y_test'); The images are stored as [num_samples, x_dim, y_dim, channels] in HDF5 files. The pixel intensity values are not normalised, and are in a [0, 255] range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0050.006
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisFrench-language works237,207