MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6893173228 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14981294

Sclerocoelus grandicercus Kuwahara, Marshall & Paiero, 2025, sp. nov.

2025· article· en· W6893173228 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeMeristicsParenthesisHead (geology)Etymology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sclerocoelus grandicercus sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: E1D8EB53-CCF3-4A48-AFB7-F85A3D19E4DA Figs 6J, 61–63 Etymology This name refers to the enlarged pseudocercus of this species, which are much broader than those of any other species of Sclerocoelus (from the Latin ‘ grandis ’, meaning ‘large, grand’). Material examined Holotype COSTA RICA • ♂; Cartago, Tapantí National Park, La Esperanza del Guarco; 9°42′00″ N, 83°51′49″ W; 2700 m a.s.l.; 17–18 Aug. 2001; S.A. Marshall leg.; oak forest, treefall pans; MNCR debu00203263. Paratypes COSTA RICA – Cartago • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; DEBU • 1 ♀; Tapantí, Macizo de la Muerte National Park, La Esperanza del Guarco; 9°42′00″ N, 83°51′49″ W; 2700 m a.s.l.; 17–18 Aug. 2001; M. Buck leg.; oak forest, yellow pan traps; DEBU • 2 ♀♀; Tapantí, Macizo de la Muerte National Park, La Esperanza del Guarco; 17–18 Aug. 2001; S.A. Marshall leg.; MNCR. – Heredia • 1 ♂; Braulio Carrillo National Park, Barva Biological Station; 16 Feb. 2003; S.A. Marshall leg.; sweep downed bromeliads; DEBU. – Puntarenas • 1 ♂; Monteverde Reserve; 1500 m a.s.l.; Feb. 1980; W. Mason leg.; cloud forest; MNCR. Description BODY (Fig. 61A). Length 3.3–4.6 mm. Head dark brown, lower fifth of frons and gena yellow; face and antennae orange. Frontal width 2.2 × frontal height. Two pairs of strong interfrontal bristles surmounting a fine third pair; anterior orbital 0.4× length of posterior. Palpus yellow. Eye very large, greatest height about 4.5× shortest genal height. Thorax brown, scutum with paler lateral edges. Two pairs of dorsocentral bristles (anterior pair only slightly larger than surrounding acrostichal setulae) separated by 6–7 rows of acrostichal setulae. Membrane around prosternum bare. Legs brown, base of fore femur paler. Fore femur with three large ventral preapical setae. Ventral surface of male mid tibia with two rows of stout setae in apical third. Wing (Fig. 6J) slightly infuscate. CS2 0.8 × CS3. Halter brown. MALE ABDOMEN (Figs 61B–C, 62). Dark brown, posterior edges of tergites sometimes slightly desclerotized. T2–5 and S2–4 uniformly long-setose with large posterolateral setae. S5 rectangular, 1.4× length and 1.1× width of S4, laterally setose, posteromedially emarginate with a dark, densely setulose, Y-shaped posteromedial lobe flanked by pale areas and dark setose patches. Anterior flange of S6+7 large, 1.5 × as long as wide. Sclerite A dark, setulose, separated from S6+7; sclerite B thin, dark, elongate, and arched; sclerite C indistinct; sclerite D elongate, projecting posteriorly from left side of posteromedial lobe of S5; sclerite E short, elongate, similar to and projecting parallel to sclerite D; sclerite F large, subquadrate with an elongate apicoventral lobe on left side angulate to main part; sclerite G dark, elongate, posteriorly fused to sclerite F; ring sclerite small, dark. Epandrium moderate, 0.5× length of S8, height 1.5× maximum length and 0.8× maximum width, uniformly setose; anal fissure rounded; perianal pads weakly developed. Pseudocercus large, fused to posteroventral corners of epandrium, and bearing three setae; halves of subepandrial sclerite very broad and flat apically, strongly arched, and separate. Subcercus subquadrate in lateral view with a triangular posteroventral lobe and a small, slightly curved posterodorsal lobe. Hypandrium with thin, Y-shaped anteromedial apodeme. Surstylus simple, elongate, apically rounded, slightly curved posteriorly, densely setulose laterally with a small, dark, anterodorsal lobe. Postgonite elongate, sinuate, flattened, distally expanded and striate. Phallapodeme large, thick; basiphallus small, with a small, dorsoventrally flattened, triangular epiphallus, distally expanded and extending along dorsal margin of distiphallus; distiphallus large, dorsoventrally flattened, with long, divergent, sinuate dorsolateral sclerites and shorter ventrolateral sclerites. FEMALE ABDOMEN (Fig. 63). T7 broad, simple; T8 divided into a pale, dorsal sclerite and two large, dark, lateral sclerites, posterolateral corners slightly expanded and pointed. Epiproct large, subtriangular, anteromedially desclerotized, and entirely setulose. Cercus elongate, apically pointed with long apical, dorsal, and apicoventral setae. S7 broad, broadly desclerotized posteriorly with four large posterior setae; S8 divided into two dark, lateral sclerites. Hypoproct with thick anteromedial setulae. Three spermathecae, bulb stout, spherical, finely striate with deep invaginations at both ends, basal invagination with a small, finger-like, central process. Distribution Neotropical: Costa Rica. Remarks Sclerocoelus grandicercus sp. nov. is superficially similar to S. dasysternum sp. nov., from which it can be readily separated by larger size (3.3–4.6 mm), larger eye (~4.5× genal height), longer second costal sector (0.8× length of third), double patch of dark posteromedial setulae on the male S5, slightly tapered postgonite, and narrowly connected female S8. Sclerocoelus grandicercus and its probable sister species S. recurvatus sp. nov. are sympatric in the montane Quercus forests of Costa Rica. They are among the four endemic Costa Rican Sclerocoelus species and among the seven members of the S. dasysternum group found in Costa Rica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicDiatoms and Algae Research→French-language works237,207→