Plagiothecium longisetum Lindb.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plagiothecium longisetum Lindb., Contributio ad Floram Cryptogamam Asiae Boreali-Orientalis 232. 1872 [1873]. = Plagiothecium roeseanum var. heterophyllum Warnst., Kryptogamenflora der Mark Brandenburg, Laubmoose 814. 1906 ≡ Plagiothecium roeseanum fo. heterophyllum (Warnst.) Jedl., Spisy Vydávané Přírodovĕdeckou Fakultou Masarykovy University 308: 40. 1948. Type: Germany, Brandenburgia, Neurippen, Ruppin, auf Waldboden, Böschungen im “ Flössergrunde ”, C. Warnstorf; Westprignitz, Forsthaus “ Alte Eiche ”, auf Waldboden am Standort von Osmunga regalis, Janzen und C. Warnstorf; Wittenberge, Westprignitz, am Grunde eines Baumstammes, “ Krauses Brack ”, C. Warnstorf; Ratzburg, Buchenwälder, Prahl. Poland, Świnoujście, Weg nach Corswant, R. Ruthe (n. v.). = Plagiothecium mauiense Broth., Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 40: 28. 1927. Lectotype (designated by Wolski and Proćków 2021): [United States,] Hawaii, E. Maui, Haleakala, 8000 ft., in damp ravines, fertile, June 1876, D. D. Baldwin 221, NY 01256708! Isolectotype: FH 00220142!, MU 000000546!, YU 233890! = Plagiothecium sylvaticum var. neglectum fo. orthocladum Barkman, nom. inval., Buxbaumia, 11: 23. 1957. Type: no type was specified. Type. [Japan,] ad Nikosan ins. Kiusiu, [fertile], 16 Junii 1863, S. O. Lindberg. Lectotype (designated by Wolski and Proćków 2020): H-SOL 1563011! Isolectotype: S-B 160017, PC 0132572! Description. Plants medium-sized to large, green to yellowish, without metallic luster; stems 2–3 cm long; leaves complanate, concave, strongly asymmetrical, ovate to lanceolate, 3.0–4.0 × 1.6–2.0 mm (Fig. 4 B); the apex acute to acuminate, not denticulate; laminal cells elongate-hexagonal, in irregular transverse rows, 94–150 × 17–34 μm at midleaf (Fig. 4 E), cell areolation very loose; decurrencies of 3 rows of rectangular cells; capsule inclined. Distribution. Asia (China, Georgia, India, Islamic Republic of Iran, Japan, Nepal, Russian Federation, Turkey); Europe (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Norway, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom); North America (Canada, U. S. A.).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".