MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893212479 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15296737

Pallicephala occidentalis

2025· article· en· W6893212479 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBryophyte Studies and Records
Canadian institutionsRoyal British Columbia Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBorealPlateau (mathematics)TaigaSequoiaVegetation (pathology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pallicephala occidentalis (Cole) Specimens examined (38). BC: Dewdney; Fort Fraser; Hope, Coquihalla River; Hope, Hunter Creek; Kikomun Creek Park; Tutshi Lake, south end. YT: Aishihik, 7.2 km N; Aishihik Road, km 95; Alaska Highway, km 1800 at Swede Johnson Creek; Albert Creek; Carcross, Bennett Lake dunes (Fig. 15); Kluane Lake, Cultus Bay; Takhini River, Alaska Highway bridge; Upper Laberge. RBCM, ROME. Database and literature records (9). BC: Chilliwack, Fort Fraser, Grand Forks, Quesnel, Robson. INHS, MEI, SEM, Webb & Irwin (1991). Conservation status. BC: S3S5. YT: SNR. Distributional notes. Pallicephala occidentalis is widespread in British Columbia from the Lower Fraser Valley (Dewdney, Hope) east to the Columbia Valley (Robson), north through the central plateau (Quesnel, Fort Fraser) to the Yukon border (Tutshi Lake). It is common in the southwestern Yukon (Kluane Lake, Carcross, Takhini River). Ecoprovinces and other designations. BC: Georgia Depression, Southern Interior Mountains, Central Interior, Northern Boreal Mountains. YT: Boreal Cordillera. Range. Cordilleran. Yukon and British Columbia south through Washington and Oregon to California (Webb et al. 2013). Biological notes. Flight period: 4 May–11 August. The species has been collected along the edge of a sandy, bouldery stream bed among Populus trichocarpa seedings; in sand dunes (Fig.15), on sandy, south-facing slopes; in a dry alkaline meadow; on Salix catkins (RBCM).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBryophyte Studies and RecordsFrench-language works237,207