Bibliographic record
Abstract
STETHYNIUM Enock, 1909 (Figs 314–320) Stethynium Enock, 1909: 452. Type species: Stethynium triclavatum Enock, 1909, by monotypy. Diagnosis. Face with faint subantennal sulcus ventral to each torulus, a faint median sulcus (visible in micrographs only) extending ventrally from transverse trabecula almost to about dorsal margin of a torulus and toruli about 1.4× or more their own height from transverse trabecula (Fig. 314a); mandibles crossing each other when closed, with 4 teeth; clava 3-segmented, with the sutures between them strongly oblique (Fig. 315); frenum medially divided by a longitudinal sulcus and each paramedial plate longer than wide and light coloured (Fig. 317); ovipositor not or only slightly exserted posterior to apex of gaster (Fig. 318a,b). Male flagellum 11-segmented, with apical two segments widely joined (Fig. 319) and genitalia complex and somewhat asymmetrical (Fig. 320b), unique. Remarks. Stethynium belongs to the Anagrus group of genera. The combination of 3-segmented clava with oblique sutures between them, longitudinally divided frenum with each paramedial plate longer than wide, ovipositor not exserted either anteriorly ventral to mesosoma or posteriorly beyond apex of gaster distinguishes Stethynium from other genera in the group. Only a single species is known (from Bermuda) so perhaps the genus should actually be excluded from the Neotropical region. Neotropical hosts. Unknown. Important reference. Yoshimoto (1990).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".