Megaselia borealizona Brown & Hartop & Wong 2022, New Species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Megaselia borealizona New Species Fig. 16. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 48C8F867-0149-4AAE-B345- CB228061530F Holotype Male. CANADA: Ontario: Bell Bay Provincial Park, 45.5151°N, 77.8181°W, 329 m, 16 July 2014, CBG Collections Staff [LACM ENT 336339] (BIOUG33263-E02) (CNCI). Holotype Barcode AACTTTATATTTTATTTTTGGAGCATGAG CTGGAATAGTAGGAACTTCTTTAAGAATTATAATTCGAGCT GAATTAGGACATCCAGGAGCCTTAATTGGTGATGACCAGAT TTATAATGTAATTGTAACTGCACACGCATTTATTATAATTTT TTTTATAGTGATACCTATTATAATAGGAGGATTTGGAAATTG ATTAGTACCTTTAATATTAGGAGCCCCTGATATAGCTTTTC CACGTATAAATAATATAAGATTCTGAATATTACCTCCTTCAT TA AC T T TAC TAT TAG C A AG A AG T T TAG TAG A A A AT G G A A C T G G TA C A G G T T G A A C T G T T TA C C C T C C T T T AT C T T C TA G A AT T G C T C ATA G A G G AT C T T C T G T T G AT C T T G C A AT T T T T T C T C T T C AT C T C G C A G G A AT C T C T T C A AT T T TA G G A G C A G TA A AT T T TAT TA C TA C A AT TAT TA ATATA C G AT C AT C A G G G AT T T C T T T T G AT C G A ATA C C T T TAT T T G T T T G AT C T G TA G G TAT TA CAGCTTTACTTTTACTTTTATCTTTGCCTGTACTTGCAGG AGCTATTACTATACTTCTAACAGATCGAAATTTTAACACAT CATTTTTCGACCCAGCAGGAGGTGGAGATCCAATTTTATA TCAACACCTATTT Diagnosis. This holotype (and single known specimen) of this species differs from M. tropizona from Costa Rica, by a minimum of 2.03% (Fig. 1, Table 1). There are subtle wing venation differences between the two species, namely that in M. borealizona costal sector 3 is distinctly larger and sector 2 smaller (Fig. 16). The differences in distribution, northern Ontario, Canada versus Costa Rica, make it highly unlikely that M. borealizona and tropizona are the same species. Further collecting in northern Ontario to try to encounter more specimens of M. borealizona is warranted. This species is in BOLD as BOLD:ADJ4079. Distribution. Ontario, Canada. Etymology. The name is based on the boreal zone, in which this specimen was collected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".