Plagiothecium denticulatum var. obtusifolium Moore
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plagiothecium denticulatum var. obtusifolium (Turner) Moore, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 1: 424. 1873. ≡ Hypnum denticulatum var. obtusifolium Turner, Muscologiae Hibernicae Spicilegium 146, T. 12, f. 2. 1804 ≡ Hypnum obtusifolium (Turner) Brid., Muscologiae Recentiorum Supplementum 2: 93. 1812 ≡ Stereodon denticulatus var. obtusifolius (Turner) Brid., Bryologia Universa 2: 824. 1827 ≡ Plagiothecium obtusifolium (Turner) J. J. Amann, Mémoire de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 3: 61. 1928. Holotype: figure 2, tabela 12 “ T. 12, f. 2 ”, Turner 1804: 237. Epitype (designated by Wolski et al. 2022 d): [Ireland,] in summo montis Bulbein jugo, ab oculatissimo D. Brown lectam, benigne communicavit D. Templeton, BM 000890810! = Plagiothecium sandbergii Renauld & Cardot, Contributions from the United States National Herbarium 3: 274. 1895. Lectotype (designated by Wolski et al. 2022 d): U. S. A., Idaho, Kootenai County, Hope, J. H. Sandberg, D. T. Macdougal, A. A. Heller 1174, August 1892, PC 0132604! Isolectotypes: NY 507114! (available online), US 70396! (available online), FH 220148. Additional original material from locus classicus (not signed “ No. 1174 ”), NY 507115! (available online); additional Sandberg material, potentially from locus classicus PC 0132605! and Sandberg material FH 220147. = Plagiothecium denticulatum var. auritum Kern, Jahresbericht der Schlesischen Gesellschaft für Vaterländische Cultur 91 (Abt. 2 b): 97. 1914. Lectotype (designated by Wolski et al. 2022 d): [Italy,] South Tirol, Ortler, Martelltal, in Felshöhlungen oberhalb der Cevedalehütte, 2350 m, 30 July 1913, F. Kern s. n., herb. I. Thériot, PC 0132639! Description. Plants small, light green, with metallic luster; stem 0.9–2.5 cm; leaves julaceous, very concave, ovate-elliptical, gently asymmetrical, 1.0–2.2 × 0.5–1.2 mm (Fig. 1 B); the apex obtuse, not denticulate; laminal cells linear, 50–140 × 10–21 μm at midleaf (Fig. 1 E), cell areolation quite loose; decurrencies broad, alar cells rounded. Distribution. Asia (China, Islamic Republic of Iran, Japan, Nepal, Russian Federation, Turkey); Europe (Austria, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Kosovo, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Netherlands, Poland, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom); North America (Canada, U. S. A.).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".