MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893239511 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15568581

Year-Over-Year Growth Analysis of Restaurant Sales Patterns and Visualization

2025· article· en· W6893239511 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Retail Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRevenueFranchiseProfit (economics)Sales managementProfit marginQuarter (Canadian coin)Retail sales

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Factors in the success of a fast food franchise involve products and marketing targeted at brand consistency, low start-up costs, franchise support, and consumer convenience (Aquino, 2023). Sales fluctuations of a restaurant depend on operational strategies and location characteristics, resulting in business failure. This study explored the sales pattern of Kenny Rogers over eight years and focused on the seasonal shift in the Trece Martires branch's financial direction. The methods applied the Microsoft Power BI Data Visualization, such as Year-Over-Year and Seasonal Analysis, to recognize patterns and contrast trends in separate years. The revenue increases every December due to consumer spending and drops every January after the holiday season. It rose yearly in three years since its first establishment and experienced a 54.93% sales drop in 2020. The profit recovered after a year and multiplied the yearly growth to 134.10% in 2022, while the sales pattern moved slowly until 2024. The researchers suggested upgrading the marketing strategy every first quarter of the year and adapting the holiday season advertising.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicConsumer Retail Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207