MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893240480 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15021195

Euura pumilio

2025· article· en· W6893240480 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInvertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsType localityRibesSimple (philosophy)Taxonomy (biology)Parallel evolution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

300 Euura pumilio (Konow, 1903) Figs 314, 538 Pachynematus pumilio Konow, 1903a: 383 (key). Lectotype designated below. Diagnosis Its small size (3.5–4.5 mm), largely pale body, simple claws, and distinctive lancet and penis valve distinguish this species from the others. Type material examined Lectotype Pachynematus pumilio, here designated GERMANY – Mecklenburg-Vorpommern • ♀; Teschendorf in Mecklenburg; 53.45° N, 13.36° E; Apr. 1896; F.W. Konow leg.; SDEI, GBIF-GISHym4122. Paralectotypes Pachynematus pumilio GERMANY – Mecklenburg-Vorpommern • 1 ♀; same locality as for lectotype • 5 May 1893; SDEI, GBIF-GISHym4124 • 2 ♂♂; same locality as for lectotype; 29 Apr. 1903; SDEI, GBIF-GISHym4123, GBIF-GISHym4125. Host plants Ribes nigrum (Hukkinen 1922). Larvae feed singly inside the berries. One generation per year. Genetics COI Based on 12 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 1.08% and the nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 6.74%, is Euura fallax. Nuclear Only one sequence available. The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 2.5%, is Euura oligospila. Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, Germany, Russia, and Sweden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyFrench-language works237,207