Bibliographic record
Abstract
107 Euura caucasica (Liston, Taeger & Blank, 2009) Figs 108, 346 Pachynematus alticola Muche, 1973a: 221–223. Primary junior homonym of Pachynematus alticola Enslin, 1916 [Pristiphora carinata (Hartig, 1837)]. Pachynematus caucasicus Liston, Taeger & Blank, 2009 in Blank et al. 2009: 45. Replacement name for P. alticola. Diagnosis The holotype female is externally similar to darker specimens in the bipartita group (e.g., E. bipartita) and flavescens group (e.g., E. lienterica), but the serrulae of the saw are rather protruding and almost papilliform in E. caucasica compared to more triangular or flat in the bipartita and flavescens groups. The penis valves of the paratype (which may or may not be conspecific with the holotype) are not clearly distinguishable from E. fuscomaculata. Type material examined Holotype Pachynematus alticola RUSSIA – Elbrus Region • ♀; Terskol, Südosthang; 43.26° N, 42.53° E; 2500–2800 m a.s.l.; 8 Jul. 1971; W.H. Muche leg.; ZMHB, DEI-GISHym81560. Paratype Pachynematus alticola RUSSIA – Elbrus Region • 1 ♂; Itkol; 43.25° N, 42.54° E; 2100–2300 m a.s.l.; 27 Jun.–6 Jul. 1967; W.H. Muche leg.; ZMHB, DEI-GISHym12542. Host plants Unknown. Genetics COI No data. Nuclear No data. Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Russia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.048 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".