MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893277586 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14597044

Alaptus Westwood 1839

2024· article· en· W6893277586 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSulcusForamenGenusDorsumApex (geometry)Wing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ALAPTUS Westwood, 1839 (Figs 14–18) Alaptus Westwood, 1839: 79. Type species: Alaptus minimus Westwood, 1839, by monotypy. See Huber et al. (2020) for generic synonyms and their type species. Diagnosis. Antenna with funicle 5-segmented (Fig. 15); supraorbital trabecula with alternating sclerotized and unsclerotized sections (Figs 14a, 17); mandible with 2 teeth; head posteriorly with curved horizontal sulcus medially dorsal to foramen (Fig. 14b); fore wing posterior margin with an abrupt, recurved notch behind venation and, thereafter, posterior margin almost straight and gradually diverging from anterior margin almost to wing apex (Fig. 16); petiole much wider than long and almost indistinguishable from propodeum or gt 1 (Figs 17, 18); mesophragma projecting into gaster; gt 1 longitudinally divided medially (Fig. 17). Male flagellum 8-segmented. Remarks. Alaptus belongs to the Alaptus group of genera. Among these, Alaptus is the only genus with the funicle 5-segmented. Males have the flagellum 8-segmented (at least 9 segments in other genera of the group). Neotropical hosts. Psocoidea: Caeciliusidae. Important reference. Triapitsyn (2017).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207