HILOM: A Holistic Wellness Retreat and Recreation Complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
According to Oxford dictionary, the meaning of “holism” is a theory that all parts of a whole are in intimate interconnected. As stated by holism (from the Greek “holo,” meaning “whole”), it is important to examine the whole not just the one part, or even two parts separately. This applied to health, holism is treating the whole person — considering more than just the physical symptoms of disease or injury. In the modern world, people are becoming increasingly aware of health, encompassing mental, physical, spiritual, and emotional aspects to improve longevity and have a healthier life. These aspects are important in the human body as they improve our mind, body and soul which are essential for optimal functioning. Today, individuals seek ways to heal and renew themselves and holistic wellness retreats has become necessary in life due to the fast-paced and stress caused by urban problems. Holistic wellness retreats provide a wide range of treatments and recreation activities that is specialized to renew the mind, body and soul of individuals seeking relaxation in a stress-free natural environment. The integration of biophilic design principles is crucial to create a retreat experience by connecting with the nature that can contribute to mental, spiritual and physical well-being. Environments designed with concepts of biophilic design can lower stress levels, brighten moods and boost overall health. This proposed project will showcase all the facilities and amenities that can help them by providing treatment methods. These facilities and amenities include wellness centers, spa, yoga, meditation, health and fitness hub, healing gardens, quiet zones, pools, units, event center, healing pools, children’s activities, man-made lake, sacred garden, open areas filled with nature, accommodation units, and recreational areas. This project aims to highlight the importance of holistic wellness retreats in enhancing human health and well-being.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.053 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".