MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893286798 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14981309

Sclerocoelus mandibulum Kuwahara, Marshall & Paiero, 2025, sp. nov.

2025· article· en· W6893286798 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEvolution and Paleontology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypePedicelSternumThorax (insect anatomy)EtymologyHead (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sclerocoelus mandibulum sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 624EB012-8E65-42D5-A039-FF8A9 CAD 323F Figs 7H, 84–86 Etymology This name refers to the male postgonite which, in lateral view, strongly resembles the mandible of a rodent (from the Latin ‘ mandibulum ’, meaning ‘jaw’). Material examined Holotype ECUADOR • ♂; Pichincha, Cotopaxi National Park, Quebrada Mishahuaycu; 3600 m a.s.l.; 26 Oct.–8 Nov. 1999; S.A. Marshall leg.; along stream, pan traps; QCAZ debu00139611. Paratypes BOLIVIA – La Paz • 1 ♂; Mapac, Lago Titicaca; 16°10′ S, 69°5′ W; 23 Apr. 1997; L. Masner leg.; CBFC. ECUADOR – Carchi • 1 ♂; Cerro Pelado; 3200 m a.s.l.; 25 Jun. 1965; L.E. Peña leg.; CNCI • 1 ♂; Páramo, 14.1 km NW of El Angel; 3450 m a.s.l.; 1 Nov. 1999; S.A. Marshall leg.; under Polylepis litter; DEBU • 1 ♂; Troya; 2950 m a.s.l.; 11–13 Jun. 1965; L.E. Peña leg.; CNCI. – Napo • 3 ♂♂; near Lago Papallacta; 6 Nov. 1999; S.A. Marshall leg.; under tree branches (brown leaves); QCAZ. – Pichincha • 20 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀; same data as for holotype; DEBU • 21 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀; same data as for holotype; QCAZ. Description BODY (Fig. 84A). Length 3.1–4.1 mm. Head dark brown, lower fifth of frons orange; face and gena brown; pedicel brown, postpedicel orange. Frontal width 2.2× frontal height. Three pairs of interfrontal bristles, middle pair largest; anterior orbital 0.5× length of posterior. Palpus brown. Eye large, greatest height about 3.5× shortest genal height. Thorax brown, scutum with paler lateral edges. Two pairs of dorsocentral bristles (anterior pair distinct, 0.5× length of posterior pair) separated by 6–7 rows of acrostichal setulae. Membrane around prosternum bare. Legs brown, hind tibia darker. Fore femur with four large ventral preapical setae. Dorsal surface of male mid tibia with a strong seta about midlength and a pair of large setae at about four-fifths; dorsal surface of female mid tibia with standard chaetotaxy. Ventral surface of male mid tibia with two rows of stout setae in apical third. Wing (Fig. 7H) slightly infuscate. CS2 subequal to CS3. Halter brown. MALE ABDOMEN (Figs 84B–C, 85). Dark brown, posterior edges of tergites sometimes slightly desclerotized. T2–5 and S2–4 uniformly long-setose with large posterolateral setae. S5 rectangular, 1.0× length and 1.3× width of S4, posterolaterally long-setose and posteromedially emarginate with a broad, dark, rectangular, anteriorly setulose lobe projecting dorsally (into abdomen), emargination with long setae along margin. Anterior flange of S6+7 triangular, 1.0 × as long as wide. Sclerite A not differentiated from S6+7; sclerite B reduced, pale, arched; sclerite C dark, well sclerotized and projecting ventrally off of S6+7; sclerites D and E fused, quadrate with a pale, deflexed left lobe; sclerite F large, thick and flattened with an elongate, angulate apicoventral process on left side; sclerite G very large, rounded, inflated, ring sclerite incorporated into right posterior margin. Epandrium very large, 0.8× length of S8, height 1.6× maximum length and 0.9× maximum width, densely setose, cleft between inner ventral corner and surstylus, and ventral margin projecting ventrally; perianal pads weakly developed. Pseudocercus undifferentiated; halves of subepandrial sclerite very thin, strongly arched, and narrowly contiguous. Subcercus large, with a ventrally bilobed, rectangular posterior part, a broad, rounded inner lobe extending to near anterodorsal corner of surstylus, and a long, dorsally curved, blade-like lobe originating from inner lobe. Hypandrium with thick, dorsoventrally flattened anteromedial apodeme. Surstylus large, curved inwards, somewhat T-shaped with a rectangular, preapical posterior lobe and a triangular apical anteroventral lobe. Postgonite stout, gradually tapered, and apically curved anteriorly. Phallapodeme very large, dorsoventrally flattened; basiphallus dorsoventrally flattened near base, with a large, tapered epiphallus, distal part of basiphallus extending posteroventrally; distiphallus short, largely membranous with a pair of S-shaped ventrolateral sclerites and a V-shaped ventral sclerite. FEMALE ABDOMEN (Fig. 86). T7 broad, simple; T8 divided into a small, pale, dorsal sclerite and two large, dark, lateral sclerites, posterolateral corners rounded. Epiproct pentagonal, posteromedially cleft (almost entirely divided), and entirely setulose. Cercus large, elongate, with large apical, dorsal, and apicoventral setae. S7 broad, broadly desclerotized posteriorly with six large posterior setae; S8 broad, medially pale with dark lateral edges bent ventrolaterally. Two spermathecae, bulb elongate, bean-shaped, finely striate with a wide, deep invagination on thicker end. Distribution Neotropical: Bolivia, Ecuador. Remarks Sclerocoelus mandibulum sp. nov. is an unusual species, with an elaborate subcercus superficially similar to the S. regularis group. However, the subcercus is fused to the epandrium and there is no trace of a pseudocercus. Sclerocoelus mandibulum also resembles S. penai sp. nov., another alpine species, in having a large subcercus with a strong inner lobe and a dark, microsetulose process posterior to the posteromedial setulose patch of the male S5, but it is distinguished by the larger size, hammer-shaped surstylus, and uniquely-shaped postgonite. It cannot be confidently placed in any of the named species groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicEvolution and Paleontology StudiesFrench-language works237,207